Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

bigskyvikes

Members
  • Posts

    3,587
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by bigskyvikes

  1. Whoa whoa whoa, I never wrote, (or meant to write) that I thought the name was coming back! What's his name used the, what if the old name came back analogy (this could be used wrong) of us staying North Dakota people, or us card carrying members, as not wanting to go back to the old name because no name was unique! Just calling him out on that. I know the name is gone!
  2. You can't be serious? Fighting Sioux was, and still is "unique, confident, self-identified"! So either choice would be the right choice, but going back to the " original" one would be the best choice, except for the sky is falling crowd!
  3. Fair enough, the, (look at my beautiful writing skills) minions on here had fun taking your critiques a few steps further. The logo ideas that people show on here about other new names makes me a little optimistic about this change, but I do lean towards the North Dakota idea.
  4. Dear Sic, The point I was trying to make was all of the polls, votes, mouse clicks I've seen showed staying North Dakota is selected more than the other names. Then you had to jump my shyt about using a word wrong. I spell bad, write bad, use commas improperly....... etc! That's me, you want to add your opinion about my opinion, that's alright, just don't drag pages of comments about how uneducated I am. That's all... Now, I'm happy that more people are clicking there mouse to chose North Dakota! Even though a new nickname is OK for me, as long as its not Pride, Flickertails, or Sundogs.
  5. I feel the same, great for Gage!
  6. There's that word again! Everybody will start falling apart around here, well four people anyway, definitely not a majority! Do not mispell or improperly use a word around here, even if we knew what you meant! Here is that word again, maybe, "2 to 1 margin want North Dakota" http://www.grandforksherald.com/opinion/letters/3769729-letter-keep-unds-identity-choosing-north-dakota
  7. Yep, funny though, Wikipedia says this, A majority is a subset of a set consisting of more than half of the set's elements. This can be compared to a plurality, which is a subset larger than any other subset considered; i.e. a plurality is not necessarily a majority as the largest subset considered may consist of less than half the set's elements. *******In British English the term majority is also alternatively used to refer to the winning margin, i.e. the number of votes separating the first-place finisher from the second-place finisher.******* Wiki isn't trying to be an asshole though! Or claiming that use is "ebonics". This is like watching an episode of The Big Bang Theory. I love that show, but you know what Leonard always says they are? Edit, sorry to everyone else discussing the topic.
  8. By the way smart ass I went to Penn state! Never been a by the book writer or talker if that makes you feel better?
  9. Ok, I'm willing to bet both of you know exactly what I'm saying, or trying to say! Also that you have a shyt eating grin on your face every time you respond. Majority of THE votes or majority of ALL votes.... Maybe that? Anyway you win, I lose, you're smart I'm dumb!
  10. Ok, I understand this yet another silly argument, but if so many choices are made and 25% of them choices are for North Dakota, and the rest are less than that, that makes it the majority choice......no?
  11. Come on...? The herald vote is only 25% also, but second place is 15%! Doesn't that make 25% the majority, or has something changed?
  12. Lol, look at the vote numbers...its a majority.
  13. I'm basically a 99% in agreement with this, other than 100% against flickertails. But, now that I understand what Sic is saying in his next post, that makes me nervous about no nickname! But, BUT, why is it still an option from the committee still today?! I just can't believe anyone on here knows more than they do about the rules!
  14. How about no nickname, and the people that are whining that bad things will happen if we don't get a new nickname, just bury their heads in the sand?
  15. Ok what's with "manderpigs"!!! Would they ever think to stop giving anti UND fans a platform?!! My word!! Almost as bad as letting these losers vote and give name entries! http://www.grandforksherald.com/opinion/3764525-sound-do-you-any-final-15-und-nickname-choices
  16. I'm changing....love that first one! Wow, if they want to sell these to people they need to show possible logos.
  17. Kelly himself said "just North Dakota is still an option" any of you guys that know more than they do, have any idea why Kelly would say this if it would violate the NCAA?
  18. But these people "in the process" still have just North Dakota on the acceptable list? Go figure? Something doesn't smell right with your statement! "Can't happen, not allowed by NCAA, inside people told me so" but its in the final 11... You didn't have to quote Sics comment, I read it, and already told you what I thought of it...sorry Sic.
  19. Still think you know more, (about what the NCAA will or will not allow) than the UND does? Man I love conspiracy theories, but this Marco Hunt one is something to laugh about!
  20. Read siouxphan27's post above your post of....big word toilet paper writings! He says it better than I can. There is definitely some confusion, but you are confused with who is confused. ?
  21. Lmao, I was thinking the same thing... Must be miserable to always be miserable?
  22. You can think that, everyone knows there is something new coming, why buy this, for the time being merchandize? Common sense! Who said the ND stuff was going anywhere? I sure didn't! When we get a new nickname we will know that that "isn't going anywhere" either, does that mean sales will be poor?
×
×
  • Create New...