- Popular Post
Brett0909
-
Posts
114 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Brett0909
-
-
1 minute ago, rochsioux said:
Sadly, it was not the correct call. The call on the ice was onside. There was no replay that could conclusively say that the left wing was offside. The side views were blocked by fans. The only view you had was from the far end zone which will always be distorted due to the parallax view. There is no way to precisely determine the correct relationship between the players skate and the blue line from that far away. Not only is the foot above the blue line due to the skate blade but the blue line is not painted directly on top of the ice. If the evidence to overturn if not conclusive then you have to go with the call on the ice. Absolutely pathetic job by the linesman.
Dude, I’d finally come to grips that at least it was the right call, why you gotta bring this variable in to make me doubt again??
-
20 minutes ago, stoneySIOUX said:
Are you sure?? I never once saw a camera angle that confirmed it was offside. Piecing it all together, a completely fair assumption could be made it was off, no doubt. However, the call on the ice was onside. I'll never believe they saw anything definitive.
We’ll never know what angles the refs had, but the broadcast eventually showed a zoomed in view from the opposite goal/end that showed (to me at least, and I’m as biased as they come) that it was offsides. It was still a no-win call, but I would have had to rule it offsides conclusively if I saw that angle and had to make the call…despite the heartbreak.
-
1
-
-
So we’re already declaring that Sanderson is getting wrongly snubbed this year? IMO, he doesn’t even deserve the Hobey yet based on traditional criteria - top 5-10 likely, and hopefully he puts together a Hobey worthy second half - but maybe we should wait for him to earn it and then see how the vote goes before we play the victim/bias card.
It got me curious though, and I hate to challenge the persistent “east coast bias” narrative but a quick count shows 15 of the last 20 hobey baker winners come from “western” schools/conferences.
Sanderson is a great player and may put together a Hobey worthy year, but if he doesn’t win, there are a lot of non-conspiracy reasons for it. Let’s see how it plays out first…
-
3
-
-
Nevermind, first time on this FireTv and it had the start from beginning setting on instead of start live. Stupid!
-
Is everyone else getting some HS basketball game on their NCHC feed instead of the UND game? Seriously, how have they not figured out how to put the right game on yet?
-
Amazing how many fans on here are crucifying Weatherby for this decision. Things change. The assumption that because he was interested in helping to move forward the BLM movement, whether anyone agrees or not, confirms this two-time captain selection didn’t have character and we’re better off without him is genuinely surprising to me. His teammates voted him in, but I guess we all know better than any of them what his character was, despite a coaching staff who values character as much as any school in the country…and linking this to his support of minority activism in any way?
I’ll assume the best, wish him the best, and give him the benefit of the doubt. For all we know, this was the hardest decision in his life and coaches / teammates encouraged him to take the offer after camp which was undoubtedly a lifelong dream. Until I see indications to confirm he handled this poorly (team is mad at him, credible evidence he was a locker room problem, etc), who are we to judge? It sucks to lose him and the timing is awful, but he may have done everything right here and had best intentions throughout. If that’s not good enough and you would have honestly put your college team’s interests ahead of a lifelong dream no matter the situation, I respect that…but I personally don’t expect blind loyalty from the players.
-
14 hours ago, Sweethockey said:
In my Ticketmaster account under my events, it shows the 2 tickets I have. It also says the tickets will be ready in 74 days.
Great to know, I guess I better track them down!
-
1 hour ago, The Sicatoka said:
I have a TicketMaster account ... for my Nashville stubs.
Random question for the experts…or at least those with a better memory than me…we purchased two Nashville tickets under original season ticket holder allotment years ago. Does anyone happen to recall the details for how they were going to be delivered? It’s been so long I honestly don’t remember and don’t have any tix sitting in my ticketmaster account, and didn’t get physical stubs?
-
7 hours ago, The Sicatoka said:
Good grief ...
And they shall call the ban, the “Schlossman rule”. Way to ruin it for everyone with your top-notch reporting, Brad!
Couldn’t just let the NCAA continue operating under cloak and dagger... Guess that proves Brad had an inside source, re: “how do we see who’s in the portal?”!
-
Hard to believe whatever secret sauce UMD has been relying on for years just suddenly disappeared so abruptly. OT against UND my brain kept saying UND was the better team and something would go, but I knew UMD would somehow make it happen. Felt the same way tonight, but good for UMASS! The streak of UMD not even being a top conference team (mediocre this year) but somehow finding ways to win, ends. Go Huskies, I’ll root for you this year and this year only!
-
2
-
-
31 minutes ago, Sodbuster said:
From this picture how in the hell did they come to that conclusion!?
That was rough, especially in attendance. I remember them zooming in on that pic on the broadcast and it did appear it was likely offsides. Definitively? I’m not sure they could say that. Add the huge amount of time it took with remaining uncertainty, and the fact that did one inch really change the play in any way? Heck no. I call screwjob.
Good thing they changed the ruling the following year as a result that defensive team gaining possession - as BU did - would negate offsides, so the next time it would be a good goal! (Sarcasm).
I’m against goal reviews for offsides in all cases though. If the linesman can’t tell, it wasn’t important enough to be integral to the play so why does it matter? They don’t review face off infractions or the million other variables that are far more likely to give a team an advantage and scoring opp vs an inch or two. Takes the fun out too when you can’t even celebrate goals.
-
2
-
-
3 minutes ago, Liz3313 said:
Anyone else having NCHC.TV issues? I use an Amazon Firestick, completed the app update, and now I have had to re login six times. I can not get the game to go live and it keeps kicking me out. Any tips?
Same thing here on my FIRETV, booted out and different UI when I finally got back in. All period it would only play from the same pre-game commentary spot, can’t actually get to the game or watch it live even when fast forwarding. Wound up casting from my phone to my tv. Still not working as of right now.
-
1 minute ago, BigGreyAnt41 said:
Yup, the stream just went black.
Same. Restarted the FireTv and working now.
-
I would expect most resellers would honor the transaction and just take no action so the tix remain valid for next year unless contacted... while there’s some bad seeds out there most of them are honest. For the ones that aren’t who request a refund and leave someone with the check, and there probably will be a few, I’m sorry but I don’t know what protections the major resellers offer. I’d hope they’d have solid policies for recourse, there’s certainly a ton of other events in the same situation? Good luck!!
-
2 hours ago, scpa0305 said:
I wouldn’t be shocked to see him play top 6 on this team next year. Maybe not right away though. He had his flashes last year but was buried a bit. Year 3, could be a breakout for him. These guys are all still developing, you never know when a player can leapfrog someone else.
Agreed completely. I found myself thinking Weatherby just couldn’t finish because he always seemed to be “right there” and have a ton of grade A in-tight chances that didn’t go. I eventually changed my opinion as he still put up really strong numbers 10g) and just puts himself in great scoring position a lot. Bold prediction but If he can buy himself a split second more time and improve his net front finishing this year (thinking Gregoire or Malone), I wouldn’t be shocked to see him pot 15+ goals - maybe more if he’s in top 6 on a dedicated scoring line and first PP.
Of course, could be wishful thinking since 16g’s led the team this year.
-
Honestly if I’m a voter who hasn’t watched the teams much, I probably vote Perunovich. Plenty of people had good things to say about him and likely a deserving candidate. While we know Kawaguchi was incredibly deserving, he admittedly had a relatively quiet monster year that wasn’t as flashy for casual observers. His 15 goals weren’t at the normal bar for a forward to win. His GPA wasn’t sterling and his community service listed by UND was pretty generic. The stats didn’t represent how good he really was. Perunovich was a 3x championship participant and his offensive numbers and flashiness were on display every night. And no one voting cares he was soft in his own end. Add to that the ballots I’ve seen from UND hating media folks had Kawaguchi at five or later which is a killer when it comes to aggregate vote count, just shows how much of a joke it is to have essentially glorified and petty fans voting the best player vs qualified and objective experts.
The salty side of me is glad that while completely political, at least we aren’t seeing smear campaigns like Frattin experienced. Imagine a montage of Perunovich’s DQ’s, shoulda been suspension, and repeated march to the penalty box for the voters to consider (you know, what UND fans saw all year). Throw in UMD’s diving greatest hits and maybe the playing field is leveled against the persistent dislike by many of all things UND.
That said, saltiness and hyperbole aside, congrats to Perunovich on a great (deserving) year that will likely transition into an impact in the NHL, congrats on a NCHC winner, and good luck to Jordan next year!
-
Now that things for the 2020/21 season are at least starting to come into focus, and I was bored, I started looking at the team's known scoring losses and what would be necessary to make those up to be on-par with this year's team. Probably no surprise to this group, but for those who don't follow as close, there are some pretty strong stats from the departing players, with obviously large impacts from Michaud and Smith. Overall, the departing group averaged more Pts/G than the remaining group, had a higher shooting %, and accounted for 28% of points, 32% of goals, and 31% of PPGs. All in all, that leaves the team in pretty good shape compared to a lot of years, especially with a talented group incoming and a number of talented players who should be ready to take a step. In good news, the team returns 81% of it's GWG. All of this assumes JBD and Pinto's return, which would significantly hurt if not, of course.
I didn't bother to do any conjecture of what these numbers would look like without Guch, Kierstad, and some of the other potential departures though, which would have likely meant rebuilding vs reloading. Enjoy and happy Sunday!
GP G A P Pts/G Shots Shot % PM GWG PPG SHG +/- Jordan Kawaguchi, F, Jr 33 15 30 45 1.36 71 21.1 8 5 2 0 21 Matt Kiersted, D, Jr 33 6 23 29 0.88 54 11.1 50 1 2 0 22 Shane Pinto, F, Fr 33 16 12 28 0.85 91 17.6 46 3 5 0 19 Collin Adams, F, Jr 35 12 16 28 0.8 92 13 18 6 1 0 25 Jacob Bernard-Docker, D, So 32 7 18 25 0.78 55 12.7 12 0 4 0 21 Grant Mismash, F, Jr 35 8 12 20 0.57 83 9.6 18 1 0 0 17 Jasper Weatherby, F, So 35 10 8 18 0.51 88 11.4 20 1 4 0 9 Judd Caulfield, F, Fr 29 4 8 12 0.41 28 14.3 7 1 1 0 13 Harrison Blaisdell, F, Fr 32 2 10 12 0.38 31 6.5 16 0 0 0 10 Mark Senden, F, So 35 5 6 11 0.31 53 9.4 10 1 0 0 4 Gavin Hain, F, So 28 2 8 10 0.36 36 5.6 13 1 0 0 3 Jackson Keane, F, So 19 1 4 5 0.26 11 9.1 0 0 0 0 -3 Gabe Bast, D, Jr 22 2 3 5 0.23 28 7.1 18 0 1 0 1 Ethan Frisch, D, Fr 31 1 4 5 0.16 22 4.5 17 0 0 0 9 Adam Scheel, G, So 26 0 2 2 0.08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Josh Rieger, D, Jr 9 1 0 1 0.11 9 11.1 6 1 0 0 0 Peter Thome, G, Jr 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ***Not Returning*** Westin Michaud, F, Sr 35 16 12 28 0.8 101 15.8 14 3 4 1 19 Cole Smith, F, Sr 34 11 7 18 0.53 68 16.2 37 1 3 1 6 Colton Poolman, D, Sr 31 4 13 17 0.55 37 10.8 4 0 1 1 15 Jonny Tychonick, D, So 24 4 7 11 0.46 12 33.3 14 1 0 0 20 Dixon Bowen, F, Sr 33 6 4 10 0.3 35 17.1 10 0 1 0 7 Andrew Peski, D, Sr 35 1 9 10 0.29 25 4 12 0 0 0 17 Zach Yon, F, Sr 16 0 4 4 0.25 14 0 0 0 0 0 2 Casey Johnson, F/D, Sr 16 1 0 1 0.06 12 8.3 2 0 0 0 0 2019/2020 Team Totals 28.1 135 220 355 10.14 1056 12.8 352 26 29 3 257 2020/2021 Returning Totals 28.1 92 164 256 8.05 752 9.7 259 21 20 0 171 % Returning 68% 75% 72% 79% 71% 75% 74% 81% 69% 0% 67% -
3
-
-
54 minutes ago, siouxforce19 said:
I will sidetrack from banners to some details on next year’s schedule.
UND @ Cornell - Oct 30-31 —> this was announced by Cornell today. It will be their season opener.
other non conference opponents I’m aware of or seen mentioned on the schedules thread on USCHO are Penn State (Nashville), Bemidji (home and home), Minnesota (home), Niagara (home) and Northern Michigan (Home)
NCHC will release the conference schedule on 4/8 according to a poster on USCHO.Big series to open the season. Two of the top teams from the season that never ended...odds that some fans from whichever team wins the series will be re-crowning themselves the de facto champs?
-
Schlossman just started following Maddox Fleming on the Twitter machine and Maddox is following Berry and Osiecki. If Twitter conjecturing is an indication, he may be a potential recruiting battle between the good guys and UW (so far), and one to watch.
-
So...two own-goals. Does that mean Mavericks shutout against streak is still alive?
-
1 hour ago, squirtcoach said:
Definitely get your flu shot. Those of us that do get the shot protect a lot of people (besides ourselves) who don’t get immunized through “herd immunity”.
The issue with Covid 19 is that it early on seems to be MORE contagious than this year’ flu. Couple that with a mortality rate that seems to be 2-3% as opposed to the 0.1% this year’s flu is exhibiting and the epidemiologists are rightly concerned. It comes down to algebra.
Don’t panic, but don’t give this virus a chance gain a foothold anywhere.
Well said. Yes, media is doing what they do and sensationalizing. Yes, people going into mass hysteria is an overreaction (I should know, living in Seattle where the city is now sold out of TP...proving there ARE very real risks to public welfare, even if not directly virus related). But there’s also a reason the experts are concerned. Whether overreaction or not, the public is going to try to receive medical care for every cold, along with the serious cases, overrunning our hospitals, etc. who aren’t prepared and have no treatment, even therapeutic. Combine that with virus viability, contagiousness, no immunity buffer, mortality rates, etc. It’s easy to swing completely one way or the other on this topic and call out “the other side” for over/under-reactions, but there’s good/analytical reasons for being cautious and trying to slow/manage the fallout.
Anyway, hope everyone stays safe, this calms down, and nobody’s loved ones here are affected beyond the scare and economic/daily routine! Lord help us that it doesn’t cause post-season interruptions or issues for our favorite team when they’re on a tear! -
I’m not strongly on one side or the other, but Berry has stated multiple times that they needed to hold themselves accountable and look in the mirror over the offseason along with the players. Changes were necessary and they implemented them. Were they slow to make those necessary changes to stay on top and deserving of some scrutiny for the years prior? Possibly. Had they not turned the corner this year, most folks would likely still have the same opinion they did before and we’d never really know this team had the capability of being #1. Could they have been really good last year had coaches implemented changes earlier? Maybe. We’ll never know. So it really just shows there were valid arguments on both sides, and I’m definitely glad the coaches and players collectively figured it out and we get to enjoy a special season...and that fans still have very (unreasonably at times?) high expectations.
-
1
-
1
-
-
Couple observations FWIW:
1) Pleasantly surprised for most part with the Duluth broadcast crew. Didn’t make me cringe or whine the whole time, all I’d ask for. Thankful I had NCHC.tv so didn’t miss the Midco debacle.
2) Team definitely struggled with having no space or time. Adapted to it better by tonight. Impressive how structured and detailed UMD is in their systems year after year, with middling talent. Critical experience for this team, I think these are the games that prepare the NCHC so well for other conferences/post season.
3) Sandy sure gets the most out of his teams. Far more with less than most coaches. Doesn’t help we got them in Duluth after a borderline shocking sweep so they were playing desperate while UND appears to still feel pretty comfy...4) I made the mistake halfway through this game of being surprised I hadn’t noticed much diving (just blatant tackling and holding not being called). Maybe that is a “last resort” only when trailing or UMD needs a call bad. Right on cue...let the embarrassment begin. Always makes me wonder if their fans really don’t see it..
5) I don’t think it can be overstated that UMD having last change gave them a big advantage. I like UND’s odds a lot better if they’re the home team and can get the matchups they want, especially the “heavy line”. Probably the biggest reason to root for them to stay a high 1-seed, maybe more important than the bracket matchups?
6) Overall goaltending is a concern until they figure it out and some slack in overall systems leaves me itchy but getting out with an acceptable split and taking away some critical growing pains/lessons to prepare for the stretch run — going undefeated to end the season — is probably exactly what this team needed.
7) I really (really) hate UMD.
Hope everyone has a great weekend!
-
3 hours ago, runaroundsioux said:
Denver=Region of Death. Except BC won't be there.
No kidding, anyone not in Denver would probably feel pretty good if seeding landed like this. UND would have a dream regional although it seems like every year I think something like that, I somehow end up surprised anyway so I like the cliche from most teams “just get in”. But I wouldn’t complain if they can hold onto the #1 overall either..
Feels like there’s no real runaway teams this year, wonder if the rest of the country thinks this is UND’s year to lose if they maintain through the second half?
Hobey Doper?
in Men's Hockey
Posted
Assuming Dryden is being honest, and he’s very specific so I’d be shocked if he wasn’t, he took Vitamin D and unknowingly had a negligible amount of a SARM in his system. This has happened to others before, also with independent labs verifying their story. I take Vitamin D, and I’m sure nearly every collegiate athlete takes some supplements. Nobody tests their supplements without cause, who knows what any of us have been subjected to. This is a failing on our systems allowing drug companies to do this. Calling him a “doper”, taking away awards or similar is completely irresponsible discussion imo. If anything, the NCAA and other governing bodies should nullify the suspension based on this evidence. They knowingly have countries doping repeatedly with ACTUAL and intentional PED usage getting caught, with only a slap on the wrist, then take a stance like this?
I’m not excusing anyone who legitimately abused steroid, but we’d be kidding ourselves if we believe the Olympics are PED free. Whether you agree with it or not, PEDs usage is rampant in the Olympics, NHL, and to a lesser extent college. Dryden is likely an unfortunate bystander here of an arbitrary and intentionally poor PED testing protocol (one designed to give illusion of being drug-free, only). Feel bad for the kid getting caught up in this.