Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

BobIwabuchiFan

Members
  • Posts

    654
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by BobIwabuchiFan

  1. 11 hours ago, Siouxperman8 said:

    I think the fact that the hockey team (and therefore the hockey fans) have rejected the name and logo plays into this too.  Hockey is the highest profile sport at UND and it makes sense that a majority of business owners that co-brand with UND are banking on the hockey team.  They know the hockey crowd (in general) won't embrace anything with the Hawks logo on it.

    Please hold your cards, we have a BINGO!

  2. Just now, The Sicatoka said:

    Using the 2017 Form 990s I brought forward (linked above):

     

    UND Sports Facilities:
    Gave $751,469 to UND Athletics and $0 to UND Foundation.

     

    The rest of the transactions in the docs appear to be "bill paying" among the organizations (payroll, management fee, operating agreement fee). Have a read. That's why I linked them. 

    I'm assuming you haven't found any maintenance or capital spending budgets within these document searches?  It would be interesting to know the balances for these organizations and if any of these balances relate to maintenance or future capital spending projects?

  3. 1 minute ago, jdub27 said:

    The REA has given back nowhere near $2.3 million each year, that figure is how much UND has paid the REA as part of the revenue share agreement. It also does not include the $247K UND paid in box office fees or the $1.1 million in utilities, maintenance staff, phone service and other expenses. UND received $750K back last year after sending around $3.7 million to the REA.

     

    Champions club revenue is separate. I believe the revenue FB missed out on last year due to the revenue split was around $250K.

    So ticket revenues for Football were around $520k total based on your number above? 

  4. 1 minute ago, lawkota said:

    You do not have to be a Champions Club member to get football season tickets.

    So does the Football program actually contribute to the CC in other ways and how much is that?  If we can't mandate CC membership for Football, like we do in hockey, how much CC revenue is the hockey program producing for the rest of the sports programs?  Is the CC run by the REA or the University?

  5. Just now, UND1983 said:

    lets say its $10-100-1000...whatever.   Why does it need to be sent to the REA?   

    I have asked this question for a week now and got nothing.  

    I wasn't privy to the contractual discussions in 2001, but my wild guess has something to do with developing a trust fund to support the long term viability of the building and surrounding grounds or to make future investments in other facilities.  

    As for the revenue question it's rather pertinent...If the total ticket revenues were only $250k last year and if the football team could have gotten all of it, then it still wouldn't be the boon you expect it to be to pay for the team.  Although $125k isn't something to sneeze at, it still is not the boon the team requires.  Ultimately, how much more money does the FB need every season to be successful?  Should we be comparable to the Bison in your mind?

  6. Just now, sprig said:

    Yes on the cc member,  costs more than the tickets

    Wow, if I remember correctly you had to pay $500 to CC for two tickets and then the price of the tickets on top of that?  I would think the FB program would get to keep more of the CC money they generate, but it probably doesn't work that way in the AD...I'm assuming its a big pot and they get apportioned an amount by someone within the AD?

     

  7. Another thing that doesn't make sense to me...If the REA gives back ~$2.3 million to the AD each year as part of the deal, then who decides how that money is divided up between the sports programs?  Does the REA choose who gets what portion of that pie and if not, how is it their fault if the FB program isn't getting enough support???

  8. I keep hearing 52% of ticket sales for Football...Can someone put an actual $ amount to this?  Remember, the majority of the tickets that last 4 years of the FB program were not even at face value, so just simply multiplying the ticket price by the number of seats in the Alerus is not a true number.  I would like to know how much ticket sale revenue was generated the last year for instance - real dollars.  Also, I'm not a FB season ticket holder, but do you need to be a champions club member to buy tickets like they do in Hockey?  Remember, asking for a friend...

     

  9. 19 hours ago, UND1983 said:

    I demand they not have two words at midcourt instead of a logo.  :huh:

    Well, just pony up about $20 million and I'm sure you will get someone at the University to let you do it!  But remember, once you give the gift you are out of the decision making process because the school always knows best how to spend your money....

  10. 4 hours ago, BarnWinterSportsEngelstad said:

    Does it really matter??? on and on  and on.

     

    Fighting Hawks with logo is here for the near future.

    The Mascot is here for the near future, the Z version won the vote.

     

    What will the name of the Mascot be?

    I've heard the name should be Loogie...As in Hawk a Loogie???  The kids will love it!!!

    • Upvote 1
  11. 5 minutes ago, UND1983 said:

    FYP.  The other fan bases are warming up slowly as evidenced by the gear in the stands.

    No doubt, but much of that stuff has been handed out for free by the University...It's all part of the plan to transition and I don't blame them for that, but I don't think its being accepted as much as some on this forum want to believe.  A simple check at retailers will show you the merchandise doesn't move very fast - bad for the University and the program, but I wouldn't blame the customer for not buying a product they don't like or for the certain portion of the population that feels it's been disregarded during the whole process.  In the end, the transition will be occur regardless, but I'm not sure the fan base will be the same nor will the University.  Case in point, the looming additional 10% budget cut to the NDUS will have a bigger impact on sports and academics than the current acceptance of the new logo and mascot IMHO.

    • Upvote 1
×
×
  • Create New...