These metrics would not hold up for a proper argument on who is a better goalie haha. Less than 1% difference in save percentage when the sample size is 7 games vs 22 games?
I saw the Denver game and TJ was truly great; I’d even say it’s safe to note he probably won us that game even though our team D was better than it’s been most of the year. But being great here and there hardly equals the leash he’s been given. Hobie has had great games and then TJ still gets the start the next Friday. Hobie has had good games where we lose and the goals allowed were when he was absolutely hung out to dry. Berry has said he wanted one goalie to take over but what he meant was he wants TJ to just play well enough so he could take over.
Watch TJ play enough and you see how often he gets out of position laterally and sometimes it’s not just a little bit. Hobie is not perfect but he is better at staying in position and not swimming out in La La land. Hobie also has the size advantage which matters nowadays with the exception of some outliers (and if you don’t have the size you have to be incredible positionally, which TJ is not).
Let’s be clear, there’s not a massive chasm of difference between them because neither has been spectacular. But Hobie has never been given a chance to string a few together because if he makes a mistake (especially since most nights we are bad in our D zone), it’s automatically TJ the next night.
give TJ the edge in playing the puck but only by a small margin.
With 2 goalies who are similar in metrics, play the one with size and who can be developed. He’s only a sophomore but the last time we won a natty was with a sophomore in net.