Hayduke1

I agree that she doesn't have any real power, but disagree that it is a fringe group. The progressive movement is growing and will have a say with Biden. Definitely not enough of a say to take over the Democratic Party, but enough to influence decision makers.

Sue's Lube, why wasn't he crushed or demolished? Or even mutilated? Maybe he was water gunned? Obliterated? Pureed? Sautéed? Marinated? Frickaseed?

Either you are lying or have absolutely no grasp on reality. Maybe both? Maybe you believe she is on the board of directors for antifa? LMFAO

???? Can I get a gooneytunes translator?

Oh, gooneytunes. Anybody left of Attilla the Hun is a mealy mouthed liberal to you. But, again, they are Republicans. So, yet another lie.

Oh, gooneytunes. You know that is also a lie. And it is "cite" by the way, Mr. journalist. LMFAO.

Oh, gooneytunes. You know thats not true. You just like to lie. Why does anybody trust anything you write?

Maybe someday ee can put "former" cultist on front of yours. Doubtful though.

1 citizen. 1 vote. If you cant figure that out, you are the problem. Like I said. It is a cult.

Really? Yet, you don't understand population density and equate it to showing a GOP majority. Nothing knuckle dragging moronic in that line if thought. ROTFLMFAO

I see. So, in your mind a Wyoming citizen is worth 7 votes and a California citizen is worth 3 votes. Total votes shouldn't matter because not all voters should be treated equally. And this system will hold up in a representational democracy forever and ever without any unrest even if the minority stays in power and jams their agenda down the majority's throat. Yeah. Thats gonna work forever.

Amend the Constitution. I don't know about Russia, and your daddy Putin, but we can do that here genius. Da.

1 citizen. 1 vote. That concept frightens you. Very telling..

In your head. A lot of room there. I'll let the others know.

Really? One citizen, one vote is affected by population density? Please tell me you didn't goto UND. Because thats some hall of shame stuff there. ROTFLMFAO.

Again, it would count equally. You have no basis in saying otherwise. Just cultist talking points not backed up by facts.

No. Ir would be controlled by ALL United States citizens. Why would that scare you?

I'm guessing you haven't a clue about population density. Well, you are good at the dense part though.

Really? Is this the talking point from Fox, Rush or some other "credible source"? Why would some have no voice if it was a direct vote? In fact, all would have an equal voice. Wouldn't this help drive more voters to the polls from all points of view knowing that it actually mattered? Look at it this way. How many more Republicans might vote in California knowing that a direct vote means their vote would matter? Same thing in red states for Democrats. Democracy isn't something to be feared. It also isn't a game to be rigged.

He has tiny hands.

Mob rule if each voter had equal representation in our country? It would be in control of all citizens equally. You have a problem with that? This from the fear of Antifa folks? That's beyond bizarre.

No, that IS the bug. Disproportionate representation is the problem. It is broken because of that reason. How long will the masses accept that the one with fewer votes becomes president? You may say they have accepted this since the beginning of our nation, but it rarely happened. Now, twice early in this century it has happened. The last time by nearly 3 million votes. You cannot govern a functioning democracy ( don't give us that bs about being a republic) from a minority position for an extended period of time. Something will give.

Wow. I thought UND's history department was bad. They must have been geniuses compared to Moo U. LMFAO.

Because it gives disproportionate representation to smaller states over larger states. It is unbalanced. Wyoming voters have 1 elector per 150,000 citizens vs. California with 1 elector per 500,000 citizens. Now, if asked will it change? Probably not. It will be defended by smaller states that outnumber larger states wishing for a direct vote. Hard to chsnge the US Constitution under those conditions.

But it is. Slavery determined the 3/5 compromise. This in turn determined that a direct election of the president would not be acceptable by the southern slave states because those in bondage could not vote. The electoral college solved that problem. Interesting how property per the later Dred Scott decision counted toward representation. These are facts. Not opinion. But, you've been processed by years of BS to disbelieve the truth. Even the UND history department used to tell us the BS about the Civil War was not really about slavery. What a load of crap. Believe whatever you want, not my problem.