Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

OgieOgilthorpe

Members
  • Posts

    1,379
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by OgieOgilthorpe

  1. 4 hours ago, nodak651 said:

    Will UND actually see a fundraising bump now that Kennedy is gone?  

    With Kennedy gone, may KEM be willing to partially finance Phase II through the Ralph, similar to the Betty donation loan?

    Everyone knows that UND Hockey has by far the most support from fans.  Would UND be better off fundraising for things like the 2m in RAE funds, used for the scoreboard, and allowing the money to flow to other programs?  Currently it's the other way around, with other programs putting in so much effort for fundraising.  For instance, golf has to fundraise for their annual budget, but if the RAE money flowed through them, and the hockey program identified a fundraising need for the same amount, I think UND would have a much better chance of reaching said goal, and overall donations could increase.  Example: 2million from RAE that was used for the scoreboard goes to Phase 2, and the hockey program finds donations for a new scoreboard.  Could also sell naming rights to scoreboard.  

    How far along is UND in it's fundraising efforts for the business school?  They have a 20m donation from an anonymous donar, and 20m from the state so far, correct?  They need about 60m?  Will the business school sell naming rights?  "Cargill School of Business" perhaps?   

    Why would they name it the Cargill School of Business? 

  2. 48 minutes ago, CarpeRemote said:

    I don’t see how that helps us. Might be better to get someone with strong ties to coaches in rich recruiting area. We have Grand Forks pretty much covered.

     

     

     

    Yes bring someone from the outside in please. GF is covered and we obviously need some new ideas for the forward group. It can't get any worse, so pretty much any hire is a win. Is school out yet? Any updates on bottom dragger players getting cut? 

  3. On 5/8/2019 at 5:44 PM, Sioux>Bison said:

    Any news on Santiago or Harris? Will they try the CFL route next?

    No news is not a good sign. John will land somewhere in the CFL at best, and Harris is likely done. Pretty disappointing end result considering the hype this class had through the years. How many of us would've guessed this empty result after their Sophomore season? We all know that Brady's CFL shot probably wouldn't even exist if he wasn't a Canadian. I hope he's able to develop some with his new staff before the season starts and I hope he's able to take advantage of his opportunity. 

    How many of these Cow U kids that just signed were at the same level as Brady and John their Sophomore seasons? Outside of Stick my guess would be 0. Both Brady and John went backwards instead of forward after their sophomore seasons which shines a bright light on the UND coaching staff's development abilities. They got passed up HARD by kids in their class around the country. I'm really really hoping a lot of that had to do with their limitations caused by Rudy, but deep down I know he was only a portion of the problem. Time will tell, but UND isn't going to get many Kleinsasser caliber players to lean on for NFL production. Remember, UND is a FCS program where NFL production is an important attraction for top recruits. If an upper midwest recruit was to compare with the other 3 local team's NFL production list, they'll notice UND is far behind, if they're even included on the list whatsoever. Unfortunately they're actually behind several of the local d2 programs as well...

    As much as I'd like to be excited about the future of the UND football program, I just can't get myself to trust Bubba's system. It's hard to even get excited about seeing some top recruits sign because I don't trust the development skills of this staff, so it doesn't seem to matter who they land. Which I think is a fair argument after seeing what happened to John, Brady, Reyes, Harris, Harris, and now what we're seeing happen to Kett and some of these LB and OL. Yes some of those had to do with injuries, but that's a part of the game and other teams are getting through it. 

    Next year will be a .500 season at best with a few blowout losses. My opinion is that the Rudy termination was done 2 seasons too late and the Bubba change will come 1 season too late. Either way I'll be watching their games and contributing in any way I can, but I'm just a bit frustrated. Hopefully I break fewer remotes next season now that my expectations are a little lower. 

    • Upvote 1
  4. 3 hours ago, SIOUXFAN97 said:

    would we be in this position if the voters would have voted terry bjerke as mayor?

    Will did Johnson beat out Bjerke? 

    With the GF economy hurting, will the challenger finally beat out Johnson?

  5. 8 hours ago, Blackheart said:

    Won't need it because next year's team is going to be fun to watch...just wait and see! (fingers crossed)

    Doubtful for next year, I say in two years. 

    Either way, the tide will definitely turn if they start winning again. All these negative signs will wash away if they're a top 5 team again. 

  6. 1 hour ago, stoneySIOUX said:

    Lots of good stuff in here. I agree with a lot of it. Much more constructive conversation, in my eyes, than fire this, fire that, you know? 

    Honestly, I'm fine with Shaw being let go because it's been a very specific pain point. But, I also think it's heavily due to lack of quality scoring forwards. We have some, but not nearly consistent enough. I'd be willing to give him some time to bring it back up with some new blood. Our PP was fine (well, it was ok) when we had high end forwards, IMO.

    I think it's going to be really hard to have a team that's having trouble scoring to learn 3 or 4 different PP systems. I like the idea, but I'd think we should work on one and stick with it. I've seen teams like St. Cloud have consistently good PPs over the last handful of years and they do the same thing week in and week out.

    I'm fine with more Bast and JBD on the top PP. Both can make great plays. However, Pooly is also a bit better defensively and there needs to be at least some responsibility there. Peski is going to have a tough time cracking the lineup, next season. Kid can hit it hard, but I'm not sure he's a PP guy, for me. Honestly, I feel like we did a lot of criss-cross one timers this year. I'll definitely agree about getting shots through. Bast struggled with that this year, IMO. We had a dedicated net front guy because a lack of scoring forward, IMO. Our PP was set to give our d-men, our most talented players, space and try to pick corners. That's why a guy like Casey Johnson was in that spot. He's a big body and is trying to get in the way. That's literally it for him.

    Why would we offer him anyone's scholarship? We have that available. Feels like we'd be getting rid of a guy just for the sake of getting rid of him. Because we don't like him. However, on the ice play is only one part. Michaud is, and will, get a full push from UND. He'd be a HUGE get for this team as I'm not sure Rizzo is coming in, this year. Guys like Reiger and Peski may see the writing on the wall, IMO. We'll see with that. Yon and Johnson have roles on this team and their role is only exacerbated by our lack of forward scoring. If that improves, we won't need those guys in Top 9 spots. They can play their fourth line energy spot as both can provide this team in that role.

    Adams was a huge pain point for me, too. But, he's partly doing it to himself. Kid needs to get bigger and stronger on his skates. He's getting there. Having him in a Top 6 role is a must and will happen this year unless he doesn't produce. He's showed flashes these past two years and if he takes a step, it'll be huge for this team, IMO. 

    I think we let teams behind us a lot in chips because this team was really freakin' good on the walls. That's my take with that. 

    Good stuff.  

    Good points. 

    I actually think the lack of scoring could be blamed on the lack of playmakers more so than lack of scorers. I think UND has some true blooded scorers on this team that are just struggling to get open opportunities. Some of this could be do to the offensive strategy but I think it's mostly due to a lack of Nick Schmaltz style players (exaggerated example). Some of these guys have proven they can pot the puck in their years before UND, but they're not being presented those same opportunities.  

  7. 2 hours ago, stoneySIOUX said:

    Not trying to start an argument, just disagreeing with your opinion. I said it's mind blowing, "to me". When did I say that I don't see a dip from the 20 year trend of success? Of course it's a dip. We haven't made the playoffs. It's not a loser mentality to take a deep breath and realize it's not really that bad. We're close and our recruiting can absolutely help us get back to where we need to be. The perspective I'm asking for is the perception that we are so far off. We're not. If you want to have the opinion that we are, that's fine. I disagree.

    I don't know what needs to be tweaked, but I'd like your opinion on it. If we have actual things to discuss rather than "we've gotta fire this guy" or "we've gotta cut this kid", etc, I think I'd be less frustrated with the conversation. All of this roundabout for a bunch of guys on a message board who don't actually coach college hockey, haven't coached in the pros and didn't play in the NHL. Not that these are all prerequisites to criticize, but these things all get so overblown. 

    I'll mightily argue against Jost leaving for his concerns over his development because it's just simply not true. 

    Okay, I can understand that then.

    My tweaks? I would at least try a few changes. I'd try fixing what's broken and that might even mean tweaking a few things that aren't broken to help fix the broken. Don't laugh at my recommendations, but here are a few things I'd try. Let me know what you think

    Either let Shaw go, or shuffle duties around with the coaching staff. The ST units have progressively gotten worse 3 seasons in a row, and are now in the bottom 10 on PP and bottom 25 in PK in the entire country. Strength of schedule skews those stats, but that's absolutely unacceptable. Get someone new in there, and have them try something different. If it's not working, shake things up. Have 3-4 different PP set-ups and match it up to fit the competition every weekend. Teams will throw the film out and will just have to wait to see what UND is going to do on the PP. Forcing the same style on every single team is getting UND nowhere on the PP. It's not 1990, the PP is no longer one size fits all. 

    For the PP I would try more of Bast and JBD, especially on the zone entry. Poolman is a great all-around player, and penalty killer, but he's the wrong guy to QB the PP. I'd use JBD on PP1 and Bast on PP2. With such a hard shot, I'd try Peskie on one of the PP units more often as well. He doesn't get enough playing time IMO. The defensemen need to criss-cross and set up off hand one-timers sometimes. Taking the time to set up to take a shot will surely get blocked, and UND should know that better than anyone else at this point. They're keeping CCM afloat in the shin-pad business. Also, screw having a dedicated net front guy on the PP. Every forward should be a net front guy on the PP depending on who has the puck and when. Shuffle around and move the puck. You outnumber them as it is, but shuffling will create even better shooting lanes. Shoving a place mat player in front of the net turns it into 4x4 and that drives me crazy. Way too easy to cover, and way too easy for the goalie to work around when he knows who will be screening him and when. Lastly, Adams should be on PP1. 

    Cut Johnson and Rieger 100%...then maybe even Yon if the recruit pipeline timing works out. Do this ASAP and bring in guys early or guys that are waiting because of roster limitations. Throw everything you have at that CC grad transfer. Make the hard decision and offer him Johnson's scholarship. Move on and up. Johnson should've been gone a year ago and is wasting a roster spot. That spot could've been used by a kid who is coming into his 2nd season now so why make that mistake once again and bury that roster spot another year? No sense in keeping a Joe Webb type guy around on the team just because he filled a void once upon a time. Cutting those 3 would be no loss to this team, so the risk of bringing in someone too early or of a recruit not panning out is still lesser than keeping those 3 on the team IMO. When the injury bug hits, this team will rely on those depth guys and the current caliber of depth-guys is clearly hurting productivity. 

    Let Adams play his role. He's a small playmaker that gets knocked off the puck easily. He does not belong on a grinder line, he belongs on a line with 2 other quick forwards who can move the puck and can create space for one another with their speed and playmaking abilities. Putting Adams on a line with two bruisers isn't helping protect him, it's just bogging him down and holding him back. 

    Have the weakside winger bust the zone once in awhile and cross center ice behind the defensemen during break-outs. It'll keep their defensemen honest all game long and will help greatly with exiting the zone. Worst case you at least pull one defenseman off the blue line and create some space. Best case you create some odd man rushes and wait for it...fast break scoring opportunities. You have to keep them guessing. I think this team has the speed, skill and work ethic to do all of this but they're just coached into a corner. 

    This is much more minor compared to the offensive and PP problems, but get the defensemen to take some risks and step up before or right at zone entry every now and then. Enough of sitting back and letting them gain the zone scotch free so often. Shaw wouldn't hit the puck carrier at the blue line if he freaking ran into him. Create some big hits, create some quick turnovers and fast breaks the other way. The defensive mindset and mentality is weighing down the offense. Scoring chances can be created in your own zone and I think UND forgets that. Yes they've been pretty good at keeping shots down and odd man rushes to a minimum, but they need to get more aggressive and cause some chaos. 

    Lastly, sit down every player on your team and tell them to NEVER. EVER. lay or dive into the crease to lay on or grab the puck. Between Poolman, Shaw and Peskie, I swear I saw this happen 2 dozen times this season and I don't get it. Panic? Being told to? What's the deal? Same with Bowen trying to shove the puck into Scheels pad to freeze it that turned into a goal. CLEAR THE PUCK and live to fight another day. Stop looking like a little candy cock and diving on the puck. You'll either allow time for their guys to come in and shove the puck into the net or create a penalty shot. 

     

     

    • Like 1
  8. 23 minutes ago, Goon said:

    There's no evidence to back up that statement. The minute Jost's season was over he was under pressure from the AV's to sign. 

    IRC his agent was outside the UND locker room right after the game encouraging him to sign. 

    There's no evidence to back up a statement on either side, Goon. Just like 100% of your stories and tweets. 

    How was his locker room tunnel situation different than any other 1st rounder's after their last game of the college season? You saying he got pressured to sign like it's unheard of made me laugh. 

    How do you know his agent wasn't encouraging him to sign because he saw the writing on the wall at UND with Brad at the helm? 

    Obviously the situation was right for him and the Av's who were struggling at the time, so that was a big reason. All I'm saying is that he didn't have much to look forward to development-wise if he decided to stay, especially with Boeser leaving. You're all saying he gave no thought to what his next season at UND would be like? Or that if there were 3-4 blue-chippers and a really good shot at a national title that he still wouldn't have stayed?

    I think there's a really good chance he got a good nudge to take the jump to the NHL knowing he wasn't going to be missing much. 

    I personally agree that he could've used another season to bulk up and learn to lead. Even if he would've been doing a lot of one man island offense instead of actually leading. 

  9. 1 hour ago, stoneySIOUX said:

    Dude, you apparently need a new hobby. Seems like this program is causing you too much stress. Goodness.

    By the way, Gage originally committed to Denver and only came to UND after Gwoz left. So, how about giving Bubbs a bit of credit nabbing Trey?

    Yes, it's great news and yes he's a great recruit...but don't be silly and try to argue he wasn't a shoe-in. That would've been an absolute joke if someone else picked him up. Your argument is that Gage ALMOST went to a different school? But he didn't, he came to UND, and he played there for 4 seasons and captained for 2. All the while his little bro got to grow up watching play in probably every single home game and even bring home a ring that I'm sure he's held on his finger. He may as well of had a UND logo tattooed on his face. 

  10. 34 minutes ago, stoneySIOUX said:

    Resiliency??? To watch hockey? C'mon, man. 

    None of us like losing, but the lack of perspective just 3 years removed from a national championship after a 20 year run of hockey that's all but unprecedented, is absolutely mind blowing to me. 

    Also, you're flat wrong insinuating Jost left for concern over his development. Just flat out wrong.

    I'm just stating my opinion so please stop trying to start an argument. You seem to do that far too often on here.

    And a lack of perspective in my eyes is you not realizing that the program is currently taking a hard dip below the 20 year trend of success and of being held at a high standard. Forgive me for not having a loser mentality and for wanting to see changes to break this new streak. Seeing absolutely nothing tweaked or shuffled after 3 straight seasons of taking significant steps backward is a very viable reason for fans to be upset. 

    I didn't say Jost left solely over concerns for his development, but rather that it definitely played a big role. 

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 1
  11.  I was frustrated in 2017 when they struggled all year long and got embarrassed by Michigan State at home. It was extremely frustrating seeing Boeser struggle through injuries and to score. It was also hard to watch Jost be frustrated having little to no help when Boeser was out. If you wonder why Jost left after 1 season, did you even watch the games? His body language said it all, and he may as well have been the only forward on the ice a lot of the time. I'd bet a lot of money his decision was just as much about his concern about development with that group and coaching staff as much as it was about the Avs desperately needing new blood at the time.

    At least in 2017, it eased the pain knowing that the season was mainly tough because of all the early departures following a championship season. It also helped that they fought through all that adversity and snuck into the NCAA tourney where they actually displayed their peak execution in all 3 zones. They grew as a team throughout that season and turned into a ND hockey club by the time it mattered. They deserved to move on, but got caught in a bad review and I thought that would be the perfect fuel for the 17-18 season and boy oh boy was I wrong.

    IMO the 17-18 season was the red flag season where we all should've been frustrated and ready for change. All the bad loses and other uncharacteristic problems aside, UND got WORSE as the season went on and did not perform the way they should have after a rebuilding season.  17-18 was the season I was ready to "see how it plays out". I was ready to see how Berry would get his group to bounce back and come back fighting after a rebuilding season. It was glaringly clear that they only took steps backward in pretty much every aspect of a hockey team on and off the ice. Spring 2018 I was asking myself if Berry was able to keep his job mainly because of his contract, or because of the long term thought of letting him play out his shot. At that point I was wondering if it was more so letting him play out his shot, rather than doing what was actually best for the program long term. He's a great coach and a great hockey mind, but it's glaringly obvious that he's just not a HC

    So, then came 18-19 and they somehow yet again took even more steps back. Did that really come as a surprise to anyone? The uncreative, slow robot style of zone entry style offense that creates few to zero scoring opportunities is going to create low scoring numbers for every single recruit they bring in no matter how awesome they are. No surprise the season was a slump, and I was so past frustrated that I even stopped watching the games toward the end of the season because knowing they'd score 2 or less goals was as obvious as could be after 2.5 seasons of seeing nothing change to fix it. 

    To the folks saying they're ready to see how this next season plays out, I admire your resiliency. 

    • Like 1
    • Downvote 3
  12. If you could only pick one option, would you rather see someone new running the Special Teams unit, or see Johnson, Reiger and Yon cut and replaced with new blood? 

    I vote for cutting those 3...especially if it meant saving a few recruits from deciding to go elsewhere instead of waiting in the USHL one more season due to the log jam. I understand the D man log jam issue, but if we have any forward recruits walk because of being forced to wait around for guys like Johnson and Yon to graduate I might lose it. 

  13. 8 hours ago, Irish said:

    Absolutely no changes so far - I am very doubtful there will be.  Berry is probably our recruiting grinders as we speak.  - I know, but culture.

    You know what’s worse than watching these tournament games and thinking, UND should be here? Watching these games and realizing UND wouldn’t have belonged and has A LOT of work to do. It’s crazy how fast the tables have turned. It’s frustrating watching Denver and UMD flex with the changes and stay at top while UND progressively falls behind. 

  14. I’ve been off-line for awhile. Am I mistaken that Shaw is still employed? Is that not a huge red flag if so? 

    Or am I overreacting and we will start seeing changes once the school year is over? The obvious changes, like 2-3 players cut, Shaw gone or at least relieved of his ST duties. Those things have to happen...right...RIGHT?! 

     

  15. Are things looking up for next season overall? Having Freud at OC has to be an upgrade, as I can't see play calling, creativity, player usage, development, or in-game adjustments getting any worse than they've been the past 2 seasons. I know the RB position lost quite a bit of firepower, but more importantly how will the OL compare to last season? QB, WR, and the entire defense should be in better shape, correct? Kicking surely will be better as well.

    My novice overview would say things are looking slightly up assuming the OL is the same or slightly better. I know it's extremely early, but is my thinking somewhat on track? 

  16. On 12/9/2018 at 8:53 PM, Frozen4sioux said:

    canad is a dirty disgusting hotel, all the nooks and crannies so to say of the place are dirty and caked with dust and gunk.

    the water park is expensive and bland, which describes the restaurants as well, which are usually deserted and closed.

    top that off with the terribly designed layout with just the two elevator banks and the worlds slowest elevators and it’s just a miserable bland experience that is grossly overpriced.

    any of the hotels across the street offer better service, cleaner rooms and pools, and for about half the price.

     

    Really the only redeeming factor at the canad Is a greasy garbanzo pepperoni pizza when you need to get the plumbing unclogged.

     

    Tell us how you really feel. 

    This is a surprising review to me, as I've never had a bad experience there other than the obviously horrible service at the Tavern United. 

×
×
  • Create New...