NC$$ Dollars and Who Gets Them?

[UNDLeafsGuy]

Many years ago I heard that UND does NOT get a share of the revenue from the National Tournament

because of the fact that we are Division I in hockey only. Can anyone shed some light on this subject?

If in fact UND does not get revenue, isn't that alone enough reason to make the move to D-I in other sports?

[siouxnami]

If in fact UND does not get revenue, isn't that alone enough reason to make the move to D-I in other sports?

No way, that $$$ which only comes when we are in the F4 pales in comparison to the scholarship $$$ that is needed to compete in D1 every year.

[cujo2]

Many years ago I heard that UND does NOT get a share of the revenue from the National Tournament

because of the fact that we are Division I in hockey only. Can anyone shed some light on this subject?

If in fact UND does not get revenue, isn't that alone enough reason to make the move to D-I in other sports?

You are 100% correct in the fact that und as a D-II school does not receive a dime of the revenue from NCAA events(except maybe a percentage of the concession sales). To me that is a crock of horse bleep.

As far that being a reason to go D-1 is not a very good reason. To fund a Divison 1 athletic department you are talking some major $$$. My father-in-law is a big time sioux booster and according to him und would need to generate an additional $1M - $2M revenue each year. What und would get back from the NCAA in hockey revenue does not make the sole reason to go D-1 much sense.

[The Whistler]

My understanding is that the DII and DIII schools (CC) get their expenses covered.

I consider the NCAA policy hostile and abusive.

[Old Time Hockey]

The NCAA descriminates DIV II and DIV III schools. I feel UND should lead the charge for all other lower division schools and should sue them!