Stiouxy Posted December 15, 2005 Share Posted December 15, 2005 The play on Swanson's goal (the game winner, if I remember) was offside. He came down on a 2-on-1, and the linesman missed the call. I was sitting directly in line with the blue line at the time. No question they were offside. Also, I don't know if they could have "easily won the game by a couple more goals had they converted on the powerplay." Central didn't get a call all night, until the last couple minutes when it seemed redbeard and his lackey called some make-ups. That being said, GFC didn't play that great, and WF played pretty good. They were able to wear down the Knights by rolling all four lines most of the game, and by never having kill off any penalties. Please don't try and make excuses for why Central lost. They are an average team at best and West Fargo proved they were a better team by outplaying Central all night. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jagrfan68 Posted December 15, 2005 Share Posted December 15, 2005 to even compare anyone to a gretzky is is an insult. i realize gretzky claims it himself, but all i have to say is that crosby will never be close to as good as gretzky or other phenomenal players from the past. not saying he wont be remembered as a great hockey player. -11 and he works defensively? all he does out there is complain. he gets hit, he starts yelling at the ref when it was a clean check. hes too busy thinking hes gods gift to hockey to play defense. also, one of my younger brothers has a friend that played against shattock. he said hes good but wasnt even a standout. just the same in nhl now a few yrs later, he is good but he doesnt dominate the game like gretzky or lemieux did. now can we get back to high school hockey? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jagrfan68 Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 (edited) on another note, i have been hearing a lot of talk about Nick Klenow. does anyone think he can make juniors?..i havent watched him much but from what i saw, hes closer to JV Edited December 16, 2005 by jagrfan68 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crosby_87 Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 to even compare anyone to a gretzky is is an insult. i realize gretzky claims it himself, but all i have to say is that crosby will never be close to as good as gretzky or other phenomenal players from the past. not saying he wont be remembered as a great hockey player. -11 and he works defensively? all he does out there is complain. he gets hit, he starts yelling at the ref when it was a clean check. hes too busy thinking hes gods gift to hockey to play defense. also, one of my younger brothers has a friend that played against shattock. he said hes good but wasnt even a standout. just the same in nhl now a few yrs later, he is good but he doesnt dominate the game like gretzky or lemieux did. now can we get back to high school hockey? Ok this just made me laugh when I read this. Crosby wasn't a standout at shattuck, yes thats why he is a once in a generation talent. And all you have been referring to is stats as to why crosby is not a top rookie. Look at what he does for his team. He is regularly the best forward on the ice no matter who they are playing. So how you can say he wasn't a standout at shattuck 3 years ago just blows me away. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jagrfan68 Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 (edited) thanks crosby 87 for sounding stupid. it will help me sleep tonight. you said look what he does for his team. i must not have checked any sources before saying anything. well just for you i checked and rechecked crosby and his teammates and his team record. the record sure does not relate to how you say he helps them, and thats with the talented players they have on their team. like i said before, i know he is really good but im not going to bend over, like you are, to him just because he is the alleged NEXT ONE. Edited December 16, 2005 by jagrfan68 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbass2811 Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 Please don't try and make excuses for why Central lost. They are an average team at best and West Fargo proved they were a better team by outplaying Central all night. If you look at the Central and West Fargo game you would see that it wasn't the refs fault for the game. The shots i believe were 28 to 13 in favor of Central. Even with the two 5 on 3's in the game and a few other powerplays West Fargo probably only managed to put a handful of shots on net during those. Central just gives up to many good quality scoring chances. And when i say good quality scoring chances i mean from the top of the crease out to the top of circles. West Fargo worked there butts off and Central controlled play for the most of the game, but it doesn't matter what team you are, you can dominate play for a whole game but when your giving up probably 10 out of 13 shots to any team in the slot area your not going to win. If Central doesn't figure out a way to keep teams out of the slot and limit scoring chances its going to be a long season for them. But your doing something right when you only give up 13 shots. So i guess we'll see if they can right the ship Sat. or it's going to be a long night against Fargo South. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#1siouxfan22 Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 Central outshot West Fargo 23-16. My mistake Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
He Who Shoots Top Shelf Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 West Fargo outshot Central something like 24-16. Check your stats. Central outshot WF 24-16 maybe you need to check your stats Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ND hockeyrr Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 thanks crosby 87 for sounding stupid. it will help me sleep tonight. you said look what he does for his team. i must not have checked any sources before saying anything. well just for you i checked and rechecked crosby and his teammates and his team record. the record sure does not relate to how you say he helps them, and thats with the talented players they have on their team. like i said before, i know he is really good but im not going to bend over, like you are, to him just because he is the alleged NEXT ONE. Take your Sidney Crosby talk somewhere else. No one cares here. This is a high school hockey message board not lets talk about Sidney Crosby when no one even has talked about him on this message board. You should really think about what you are going to type before you start to for the first time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WFhockey6 Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 South won 26-0. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crosby_87 Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 South won 26-0. (Clears throat) Excuse me? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WFhockey6 Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 (Clears throat) Excuse me? They beat Whapeton 26-0. I know its hard to believe, brings back memories of the Moorhead-Monticello last year Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crosby_87 Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 Ok that is just flat out wrong to beat a team 26-0. Did weisgarber have like 22 points or what? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WFhockey6 Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 Ok that is just flat out wrong to beat a team 26-0. Did weisgarber have like 22 points or what? um he had 2 goals and i think 3 or 4 assists Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crosby_87 Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 Do you have any idea what the shots were for the game. I'm still having a tough time believing 26-0. That is flat out ridiculous to beat a team like that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WFhockey6 Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 Do you have any idea what the shots were for the game. I'm still having a tough time believing 26-0. That is flat out ridiculous to beat a team like that. Shots were 75-3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crosby_87 Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 Shots were 75-3. Oh dear god 75-3! That is unbelievable. 3 whole shots. I bet 2 of those 3 were probably icings that hit the net. Were you at the game by chance, and if so, did it look like South was on a 5 on 3 PP the entire game or what??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WFhockey6 Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 Shots were 75-3. Whapeton put a forward in goalie in the third peroid. I dont know if it was because of injury or just to salvage any goals against average. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crosby_87 Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 I feel for wahpeton. Those kids I'm sure worked their tails off tonight only to be absolutely destroyed. It's too bad South had to run up the score on them all the way to 26 though. You would think south could do something to lighten up. I'm sure they tried but come on 26-0. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WFhockey6 Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 Oh dear god 75-3! That is unbelievable. 3 whole shots. I bet 2 of those 3 were probably icings that hit the net. Were you at the game by chance, and if so, did it look like South was on a 5 on 3 PP the entire game or what??? Ya i was there. And actually a couple of the shots i thinks missed the net but they counted them anyway so i think they just got one true shot which was on a breakaway on the first shift of the game! It was a fluke play and the puck just squrited out to a Whapeton player that got behind the defensemen. And ya most of it looked like a 5 on 3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockey101 Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 Why do they even have a team like south go and play a team like wahpeton? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WFhockey6 Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 Why do they even have a team like south go and play a team like wahpeton? Ya i know but they have to and i dont think this will be the only game like that one was this year, they still have to play Grafton and Red River which i think could get close to 20 on them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riders06 Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 Ya i know but they have to and i dont think this will be the only game like that one was this year, they still have to play Grafton and Red River which i think could get close to 20 on them. They'll be luck to keep it within 26 when they play the Riders. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ND Pride Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 Ok this just made me laugh when I read this. Crosby wasn't a standout at shattuck, yes thats why he is a once in a generation talent. And all you have been referring to is stats as to why crosby is not a top rookie. Look at what he does for his team. He is regularly the best forward on the ice no matter who they are playing. So how you can say he wasn't a standout at shattuck 3 years ago just blows me away. I am not sure there is much point in trying to get into a discussion with this poster regarding Crosby. I think he is mainly interested in baiting people into some sort of conflict rather than respecting their views even though he has a different opinion - which is fine. Obviously the resources are out there to come to your own conclusions regarding any hockey player. Sometimes the best thing to do with someone who is so dogmatic is to ignore them so hopefully we will not have to suffer through too many more than the six posts we have seen so far. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WFhockey6 Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 They'll be luck to keep it within 26 when they play the Riders. Ok south is better than Red River this year, the ratings show it, and the South-RR game showed it. Red River will not score more than 26 goals on Whapeton Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.