Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

fightingsioux4life

Members
  • Posts

    16,144
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    83

Everything posted by fightingsioux4life

  1. 3:25 left. Tigers lead 5-3.
  2. More pushing and shoving. Tigers would be smart to stay out of that stuff and focus on closing this game out.
  3. Tigers kill penalty. 5:25 left. CC leads 5-3.
  4. Don Adam talking to both Head Coaches. Denver gets the Power Play!?!?
  5. Some pushing and shoving, results in some penalties. Looks like Tigers will get Power Play out of this.
  6. 7:59 left in third period. Tigers still lead 5-3.
  7. Listening to CC feed, good broadcast overall. Good announcers who know what they are talking about.
  8. 10:02 left, Tigers lead 5-3. Denver on their heels right now.
  9. Power Play over, still 5-3 Tigers.
  10. Less than 14:00 left. Tigers still lead 5-3 Denver going to the box, CC on the Power Play.
  11. Denver going on the Power Play.
  12. 16:25 left in third period; CC leads 5-3.
  13. I really hope the Tigers don't screw this game away after leading 3-0. The difference between 3rd and 4th place is huge. Go Tigers!
  14. We STILL owe them for 2001. AND last year in Milwaukee! Bring it on, Hockey Least. WCHA Rules!!!
  15. Two words, PCM: Bruce McLeod
  16. If somebody knows the WCHA tiebreakers and in what order they go in, please post them. It could become very relevant for us in about 24 hours.
  17. Sioux hang on for a 3-3 overtime tie. Lamoreaux gave us that tie with his save at the end of regulation. Gotta go for 3 out of 4 tomorrow night.
  18. Penalty on Sioux. Now we'll be lucky to get one point.
  19. 1:32 and counting.
  20. I HATE the shootout. The NHL had better not use the shootout in playoff games....ever!
  21. Almost as ugly as his goaltending skills.
  22. Come on, Sioux, let's get a goal and get out of here with a win.
  23. Lamoreaux saves our butt as regulation time expires. We go to overtime, tied at 3. Biggest overtime of the season coming up.
  24. I think they won it during the flood year (1997) and I think they won it again later on, but I am not sure what year it was.
  25. DaveK, You have a lot of nerve talking about an "attitude of entitlement" from Grand Forks fans. Fargo South seems to have an attitude of entitlement in every sport. The Grand Forks schools (except for Central this year) are very good in hockey. Fargo schools are very good in football. Bismarck and Minot seem to have the best basketball in the state. Hockey has become much more competitive in North Dakota and that's good. It is not good for the sport to have one school win the title every year (Central won the first 13 state titles). There are more programs and more kids participating. And I am glad Fargo is finally starting to take hockey seriously by building a new arena complex. But I get sick and tired of Fargo South fans coming on this forum and talking like their hockey program is the greatest thing since sliced bread and that no one else is even close (I know I am paraphrasing, but that is the tone of the comments). South has won three state titles total (1994, 1999 and 2006) and finished runner-up several other times. Grand Forks Red River, by comparison (which opened around the same time as FSH), just finished winning their 13th State Championship. South has a long way to go to match the tradition of Grand Forks Red River (or Central for that matter). Yes, FSH has built a good program and they deserve credit for that. But that doesn't mean the sport revolves around FSH. I enjoy it when the Bruins lose and I am not sorry to admit it. End rant.
×
×
  • Create New...