Scratch

They looked good against st thomas, but the schmaltz highlight they just showed makes me think I haven’t seen any high end moves yet from anyone this year. Our supposedly best in the country D has been burned about 15 times this weekend in transition. Offense was a general concern going into this year I thought and idk how that has been put to bed by Sioux sports by beating st thomas when it’s clear at least to me that being down 3-1 with 10 left in the third means game over

Just one guys opinion. How you see it?

I’m with him though, this team lacks offensive talent big time. So far it’s been James and Zellers and that’s it who have looked good. Reschny has been surprisingly bad for the 18th pick

Nchc nickel and diming the commercials like the nfl

Reschny looks panicky

It’s appears strindens sophomore year was the crescendo

Good win. Even though we didn’t do anything with them the gophers got hosed with those penalties. Anyone know why jax gave Simpson the power play? To my recollection it was only bad when we had no talent in the janatuinen ford type years

Don’t get how the sit down with Budge hasn’t been killed yet

Is the reason we haven't hit anyone in 3 years because Kleven got 5 and a game for it every weekend

Unfortunately it cant inform if we'll be good, but it can tell you if we're going to suck, like last year

Just tried to buy tickets to the gopher game on ticketmaster lol. For maybe half a second, there appeared to be at least a thousand tickets. Then poof.

Because there are new Canadian leagues with talent that also need to be watched. Every minute watching the NAHL is a minute spent not watching 4 vastly superior leagues where nearly all our players come from

Can anyone explain to me how bringing in NAHL players can be construed as a good thing? I can’t fathom why Chyzyk would even be watching that league at all. Our August recruiting pull of this and Merrimacks scraps while everyone else is piling up first rounders seems like the berry recruiting method

Not that it really counts cuz there were like 16 teams, but 1950-1966, 15 in 16 years. More legitimately - from 1973-1983, 10 titles in 11 years. WCHA won something like 60% of all titles over ~60 years. The NCHC has been great out of the shoot and hasn't hit a lull yet, but it will eventually like every conference does. If the NCHC has won 60% of titles after 30 years every member of the forum can mail me their oldest shoe and I will eat every one.

I feel the same. I’m sure they’ll be soft as usual but might be the fastest team this year. Which Nathan Gerbe taunt me is a formula that can be pretty good unfortunately

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/podcast/240-the-athletic-hockey-show/episode-1048/ comments on zellers and Swanson performance at summer showcase at 30:15

Great conference, but doesn't hold a candle to the former

My guess is a depth nobody transfer

WCHA had its doormats for sure but it had four blue bloods which made it a challenge to win every year. Now all UND should have to do to win is catch Denver on an off year. I'd agree that the big ten is looking more legitimate, in large part because of fucking Pegula money round 2.

Ah now I remember, he was atrocious first half then lights out after Christmas. As far as I’m concerned, conference championships stopped existing when Pegula killed the golden goose. 6, 7, 8 team leagues don’t require a great team to win, Minnesota and UND show it like every other year

Ford was pretty good. If I remember correctly Driscoll was the definition of average. I wouldn't say either moved the needle.

With Tyler Young signing is it fair to assume our last forward for this year will be another old transfer? Only criticism of the new staff I have so far is that we are still taking scraps from bottom-tier programs (no offense to Young) born out of desperation to fill the lineup. I hope that is because we couldn't get young skill to round out the lineup. If its by design, not sure what to make of it as we've seen how that's worked out the last four years (zero transfers with any notable impact, other than negative) while BU has taken the young and skilled strategy to the frozen four every year.

I agree that Liv is a very good player but for whatever reason I don’t think of him in that elite category like Stecher and Poolman. If freshman year Emery is your #1 d I have to believe there’s no chance you’re making the tournament. But Verhoeff is going to come in as the most skilled d, by far, and with the rare attributes of also being the biggest and perhaps strongest defenseman on the team right from the gate. That assuages my usual apprehensions about freshmen d big time

Agreed. I think Verhoeff is currently either the best D or second best D on the team behind Livanavage. The idea that our D core is stacked doesn't resonate with me. Last year I saw a bunch of middle pairing guys, even Livanavage would have been middle pair in the mid-2010s

Wouldn't be surprised to see a Mankato or Quinnipiac type win this year. All the blue bloods might be particularly young, tiny, and soft - us included.