SportsFan13

Gotcha. Santiago looked very, very good against the Cowgirls and not so much against Drake. Has to be in the middle of those two performances...and really it's more on the OL than the RB in my opinion. He has the best upside if he stays healthy.

Sagarin has a way to "slice it" that looks at current results and also a more holistic approach to results. Both paint a similar result.

Joe Sensors puts on the best show in my opinion. Multiple TVs on the game.

Hasn't happened since 2007 with the one man show Chappell leading the way. That was the last time the team went for over 2000 yards rushing.

Who are the 2 besides Smith and I assume Santiago? Also, has UND had a year with 2 or 3 ever? Burnell was fun to watch as was the GF Central RB...totally blanked on his name. But I don't recall having 2 let alone 3.

That is funny. Most reasonable systems would say UND is the better team. Please name even one?

Nope. Santiago is too small and won't hold up. He's talented, but needs to get to the weight room.

Massey is giving UND a 2% chance at winning this game (the lowest of ANY remaining games on the schedule) and Sagarin has the Bison winning by something around 27. Both systems take into account past opponents, data, etc. So with those two facts in front of you...what is your definition of "good shot" at downing the Bison? And, what data do you have to support that definition?