sprig Posted August 4, 2010 Share Posted August 4, 2010 2010 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PSB Posted August 4, 2010 Share Posted August 4, 2010 2010 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iceberg Posted August 4, 2010 Share Posted August 4, 2010 interesting that they decide to be 3 MHz off an existing (and up 24/7) transponder that is at 12050...this might not be good (just sayin) 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PSB Posted August 4, 2010 Share Posted August 4, 2010 interesting that they decide to be 3 MHz off an existing (and up 24/7) transponder that is at 12050...this might not be good (just sayin) Noticed that and thought the same thing........... thought if I did not mention it, it would go away : ) Lets all hope it does not cause us any problems. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iceberg Posted August 4, 2010 Share Posted August 4, 2010 I agree... 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bincitysioux Posted August 4, 2010 Share Posted August 4, 2010 interesting that they decide to be 3 MHz off an existing (and up 24/7) transponder that is at 12050...this might not be good (just sayin) Iceberg, could you expand on this potential problem?......... The reason I ask is because for the last two seasons, the transponder I scan in is always exactly 3 MHz off of the published coordinates. This is on virtually every channel I tune in on my FTA system, which is motorized. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.