PhatKroger10

@siouxforce19 Yeah, I kind of presumed that they would use internal lists regardless. Just kind of odd that their "final rankings" are before their hockey is done. @Chris Makes sense. Gives them a couple more games/players to check out for their internal purposes. Thanks, guys!

Does anyone know why they release this final list while the U18s are still going on? The draft isn't till late June. I feel like the U18s could really change some stock values.

A funny story about Rocco: A friend of mine said he saw him in the Gamble (the business building) bathroom. Man courtesy, gave him a two urinal buffer. When Rocco finished, he zipped up and took a step back and literally high kicked the urinal handle, then went and washed his hands for a good two minutes. Looks like we may have a real germaphobe? Anyways, I totally agree with jk. I think Tambellini, Johnson, and Murphy may have to earn their stripes before we see them penciled in as first/second liners. I think the most likely first line would be some combination of: Parks-Mark MacMillan-Grimaldi I'm pretty interested in the D pairings, also. Our three defensemen that played in the NCAAs each lost their counterpart.

Wish they would have had a little more in front of the net type action, but he definitely looks like an excellent addition.

Hey everyone, new to the forum! I'm looking forward to this upcoming class or two. I've seen some people who sound rather discouraged due to the lack of 'superstars'. But look at the 06-07 and 07-08 recruiting classes. They didn't necessarily feature superstars, but had great committed players like Chay Genoway, VandeVelde, Frattin, Malone, etc. I'm really liking this recruiting class, but as stated earlier, we will definitely see some growing pains. I really hope we don't lose someone like Tambellini doesn't change his mind suddenly because it sounds like he could be a key cog of this class. I read in a forum somewehre that Grimaldi said that he intended only on playing one year here, could anyone provide an article of proof? Thanks!