PCM

UW and UMD still 0-0 in the third. Yawn.

Good PK. Let's just play good solid, smart hockey from here on and not give SCSU and reason to gain momentum.

UMD and UW 0-0 at the end of 2.

Is that the same guy who started the "our freshman class is worthless" thread?

UMD and UW still 0-0 early in the second period.

4-0! That's what I'm talkin' about!

That would be nice. I'd like a boring third period.

It's a poor man's Bean Pot.

UW and UMD 0-0 at the end of one period.

Sioux will have a power play to start the 2nd period. There was a slashing penalty on Stephenson of SCSU at the horn.

Darcy Zajac T.J. Oshie Chay Genoway

Let's get the all-important 4th goal.

It's Mary Turco.

Genoway! Sioux lead 3-0.

Man, EJ can fire that biscuit.

Time for a shortie, just like MTU just scored to go up 2-0 on the Gophers.

Good start. Goal by the fourth line. Let's keep it going, boys!

He should be suspended for the rest of the season.

Motzko said in the pre-game show that it was important for the Huskies to get out of tonight's game without any injuries. I hope they play that way.

All I have to say is that anyone who watched Don Adam ref the DU-CC game last night would understand that there are problems within the league. There's no way he should still be officiating. It makes you wonder exactly an official would have to do to be booted out of his job. So my complaint that started this tangent had nothing to do with the officiating at a UND game.

From the Seattle Post-Intelligencer: Booing at games may be banned Will decision make you cheer or jeer? It won't be long before one team won't be allowed to win because it will make the other team feel bad.

Here you go. VIRG FOSS COLUMN: Flood of comments on officiating http://www.grandforksherald.com/articles/i...;section=Sports

Does anyone else think this headline is extremely misleading? When I read it on front of this morning's Herald, I immediately wondered what sealed documents the NCAA wanted. Then I read the story and learned it's the NCAA that wants to seal some of its documents. The headline is accurate, but any headline that can be read two different ways to have opposite meanings is a poorly written headline.

This is an interesting development. Why wouldn't the NCAA want the public to know about its policy-making discussions? What does it have to hide? It's not as if there are trade secrets or proprietary information involved. If everything was properly done, why the need for secrecy? It'll be interesting to see how the intrepid defenders of the public's right to know will react to this news.

CC beats DU 3-0.