Yeah I figure the realistic strategy for the Hawks would be for the guards to hit the three and slash to the hoop, while limiting touches for the Cats down low. We play your Big Sky mates NAU every other year or so. The times they've come close is with a slow, guard dominated, low possession game, shooting 3s and running a zone. But the fast tempo is what both schools seem to want. Many programs that don't normally run zones have tried it. No matter level of opponent, it usually causes about 4-5 plays of bricks and confusion for the Cats, before adjustments happen. We have no idea why the zone confuses even temporarily. The guard play could be a draw, but unless fouls are called oddly, the bigs will be UND's critical weakness I don't think they'll be overcoming, unless Bernstine and Avants really come of age. Players like Shanks are usually eaten alive, and as stated more of a liability as a foul magnet.
Defensively, if you haven't seen Arizona play much, there is really no single defensive super stopper (Kadeem Allen at 2 is the closest). Taken individually the front line isn't that dominant defensively, but the packline defense is very much a system and team effort.
A few school cultural questions: Who is your arch rival? I notice a sudden upswing the past few years in all the Dakota schools regarding basketball. Do you normally refer to yourselves as the Fighting Hawks? Other fans tend to refer to us as Zona, which is fine and liked, but the vast majority of our own find it awkward to call ourselves Zona.
Thanks for the welcome. I normally am not a "opposing board visitor" except during tourney time. I notice non-conf visitors on boards are always greeted warmly, but I am likely to get glib comments and slights on another Pac-12 board.