Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

chicagolandsioux

Members
  • Posts

    46
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by chicagolandsioux

  1. Interesting topic - I really believe that there is no great way to divide the classes - put Grafton in class A and they get hammered, put them in class B and year in year out they do the hammering because they have many times more students than some of the smaller schools. All of the old small class A schools are now class B - Rugby, Grafton, Trinity, Bottineau, etc and not just because of population loss - they either are at the bottom of class A or the top of class B. These teams seem to dominate now, and mainly because of numbers. This is not to say smaller schools don't get to the dance because they do, but it is frustrating to watch a team like Trinity who recruits and keeps their numbers under the class A limit take it to the public class B schools. Same thing year in year out with Shilo Christian.

    The middle child syndrome. There really are not enough big little/small big schools to have a third class is there? As for Trinity what is their point? Really how fun can it be to win a rigged game? One thing that might make a difference is to not allow athletes to get any financial assistance. That should go for all private schools. If you can't pay the tuition on your own you can't play. It would be interesting to compare how private schools that give financial aid do in sports to private schools that don 't?
  2. And the motels. Two of the largest WDA schools are right in town, eating at home, sleeping at home. People come to the B from all corners of the state. They spend money. Jack's logic is flawed.

    In complete agreement with you. Those small towns come in great numbers. Spend money on hotels, restaurants, etc.. I have always thought the best state tourny to have for an economic impact was the B. Those small towns bring more fans than Minot, Dickinson, or Williston. Not only do the kids and parents come but everyone else in the area. It has more meaning to them. The Big 6 (GFK, FAR, MOT, ISN, BIS, DIK) residents on a whole could care less about how their high schools do in sports. Whereas the small towns it means the world to them, including the 85 year old lady in the nursing home. There is just something really special about this tourny. You don't need to know a thing about the towns or the schools to enjoy the feeling you get from watching it. It is so storybook.
  3. Jack Michaels from www.740thefan.com says Bismarck doesn't care if they get the State B back, as the WDA is a bigger deal for them. Says as long as State B and WDA are same weekend, this will be the case.

    I don't believe his take.

    I would say the store owners in Bismarck would say different. Isn't that how people usually respond when they lose what they really want?
  4. I agree about having it in Scheels. The trouble is, teams don't make the tourney every year and to deny the kids a chance to play there is hard to place in the way of atmosphere. (Scheels is great don't get me wrong)

    I was a freshman at umary and a kid from Hazen was telling me about his High school football run and getting to play in the Fargodome. Sometimes where you play is part of the experience for the kids.

    Keep the B in Bismarck/minot where it belongs. East doesn't really respect it like it deserves.

    Good point on playing in the best arena. I agree that the B should stay out west. I don't think though that the east doesn't give it the respect it deserves. It seems more like the east does not have the right facility to hold it in. People in the east have always loved the B. The atmosphere of because of the size of the Bismarck Civic is what made it so good. From an economic stand point I understand why the east would want the tourny. It has to be a bigger impact than the hockey tourny does.
  5. I appreciate your understanding of this topic, because it's better than mine. The last part of your statement is the part that I still don't grasp. I understand that investors think about percentages, that's a simple concept. We all want to invest our money in areas that yield the best return.

    In the example where you said that by law the payments out have to be at least 85% of the premiums paid, the premiums aren't an investment, it's other people's money. The insurance companies keep a percentage of it to cover their cost of doing business. This is why I think that the "absolute" margin matters. As the insurers add more insured individuals to their plan, their cost of doing business per insured individual should go down. They need to employ people to make a formulary, for example, but once they have a formulary, it is applied to each patient. Sure, they have to employ more people to manage all the payments, denials, questions, etc., as they add more insured individuals, but they also have many costs which are fixed, so that each new patient should increase their revenue. Wouldn't this explain how the CEO of a huge insurer like United Healthcare can be paid $5 million? Did he personally invest $30 million and his return on investment is 15%?

    You forgot to mention United Health being sued by their stockholders over the Dr. Bill McGuire backdating stock option scam. Where all these shares hit the market devaluing the holdings of the stockholders.
  6. Breaks are different than handouts and entitlements IMO. If one pays a 1/4 or a 1/3 of their income in federal taxes and someone else pays nothing...zero...into that federal tax pot................

    I think we will have to agree to disagree on this so it doesn't go down a political tangent it shouldn't go down.

    Back on topic...anything yzerman puts in this space...read it and take the time to understand it.

    Though the people who pay little to no income tax pay a higher percentage of their income in taxes than you do. That is why the argument always stops at income taxes and not total taxes as a percentage of income. Because when that occurs the argument of who does not pay income taxes as talking point lose the argument.
  7. Its kind of a keynesian debate then whether or not gov spending into private enterprise is the best way to expand economic growth. At this point we are addicted to it.

    The other issue is the mobility of labor/capital. If I am very bright and motivated, I want to get paid. If it isn't in healthcare, I go somewhere else.

    Think of the surgeon working 60-70 hours per week for $400k per year. if that becomes $200k, he/she isn't going to work 60-70 hours, requiring more surgeons to keep up with demand. If I am an very talented 22 year old, I then question the value of incurring $200k in debt and foregoing an decent income until I'm 30. Then you lose docs or lose docs with talent.

    Reagan and Bush I both used government spending to get the country out of recessions.
  8. I dig the B tourney too. Loved it when they played in Bismarck. I remember Epping and their run up to the championship with Hillsboro. Although I think the B tourney is much more fun than the A...I will NEVER forget the Fort Yates/Minot championship game. That game was unreal..and the underdog/small school won! Would have won by more if the 3 point shot would have existed then...

    Was that some time in the late 60's? I remember being little and watching Fort Yates. They had the one kid who was great.
  9. I agree - 1992 Minot vs Bismarck game was rockin'. Watched a couple of tournament games this year...sheesh...I've seen more people in the stands at my team's broomball games at Lexington Park in Roseville!

    Sad as it is maybe having the tourny next year at the Scheels will create some of the old atmosphere. The REA is just to darn big. Reminds me of the Minnesota girls tourny being played at the X instead of Ridder where it belongs.
  10. Two private schools going at it now. Only two left in class A. So this is the championship game for best private school in the lower division.

    Neither should be there. You look at the public schools and those kids pretty much grew up playing together. The private school kids only started playing together when they got to high school.
  11. Seriously??

    This thread was an initial discussion about NDBCBS and a rate hike. yzerman19 gave a thoughtful and educated explanation I thought.

    We could turn this political on "subsidies" but don't think that would get us anywhere.

    Bottomline is if one doesn't have an educated and informed understanding of healthcare insurance or the ACA this conversation will won't be productive either.

    That is not answering but avoiding. Why are these breaks you are getting not a subsidy?
  12. When did the state B tourney start playing in GF? From watching fb games online the Alerus is too big for those games. Could say the same thing about the REA for hockey also. I remember growing up watching the B tourny with Jim Adelson announcing from Bismarck. The atmosphere seemed great then. That atmosphere would be lost in the Alerus. Keep the dang thing in Bismarck or Minot, if there are any hotel rooms to be had in Minot like tradition calls for.

×
×
  • Create New...