Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

siouxfan4life99

Members
  • Posts

    39
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by siouxfan4life99

  1. Just got back from watching all the games (minus one period). First game I missed the first period, but the 2nd and 3rd periods South completely dominated Century. The score reflects that (6-1 in those periods) but it could have been even more lopsided than that. South's defense is down from last year (how could it not be?), but they have a lot of offense and a good goalie, and seemed to be playing pretty well. The first period looks like it was a lot closer though - someone else can comment on that, but it was 1-0 Century after 1 and I think only 10-6 shots advantage for South.

    The second game was probably the best of the day (not the most exciting, but the best overall). Grafton was clearly the better team, but not by a huge margin. They stepped it up at the end with a couple late goals, but this game was tight all the way, before ending up 5-2.

    The third game ended up being the biggest blowout, but was a lot closer than the 6-0 score indicated. I didn't follow much hockey this year, but how did Bismarck end up winning the West? Were they favored or was there an upset? For my eyes, they were the third best team from the West (after Minot and Williston). Anyway, Devils Lake outplayed them from beginning to end and were rewarded with a lot of goals. I think a 4-1 or 4-2 score would have more closely represented how close the game was, but Devils Lake clearly was the better team.

    The last game was the most exciting by far, but was also probably the most lopsided on the ice. The shot margin is a little deceiving, but Red River definitely dominated play throughout. Williston actually played a lot better at the end I thought, until the last 3 or so minutes. The first period was all Red River, but Williston withstood it and improved from there and almost held on to the end. They really had a good game plan to try to counter Red River's superior skill and experience - they hit hard and played the positions and got sticks on almost every pass and shot. They didn't take any chances and never gave up any odd-man rushes. They also played smart and only took a couple penalties. I don't care what the shot count was - Williston played a great game and deserved to be as close as they were. There were a lot of shots, but they were all contested and only a few "great" scoring chances.

    Overall, I think the West played pretty well but it's clear they're still a notch below the East. I think Century was definitely outclassed, but the other three West teams belonged there and could have won at least one of the games.

    I tried to be as neutral as I could, but I do live in Fargo and probably can't help but be a little biased.

    Nice post puck. At least there are a few decent ones on here. All the teams play hard. Good luck to all the teams going forward in the tournament.

  2. This is a thread to discuss the future of West Region hockey. Lets explore the upcoming classes for the schools in the West. Look into what it takes for a West team to knock off an East team. Post updates on any recruits that might be looking at a West school... You get the idea.

    Well Williston will have a lot of young offensive talent coming up. They do not lose any D men I believe. The biggest question will be who replaces Boldt and Haugenoe in net next year. If they are able to get some solid net play I look for them to be quite competitive in the West next year. They will have a very legitimate Mr. Hockey candidate in Colby Rehak along with several forwards who will be sophomores next year that would put some pucks in the net. As far as what it will take to knock off an East team in the tournament, I would say the West just needs to get more kids invovled early on and get more depth where they can roll at least three lines consistenly. You will not win against the East rolling two lines. I also think another big thing is getting facilities with year round ice out West. I know Williston for example only has ice from about early November to probably late March. If teams want to be competitive out east they are gonna have to put in the work over the summer in the weight room and on the ice.

  3. Yup, they are all playing for consolation champisonship.

    Wow and humble you guys are too. You people need to get a life if that is all you have to do it sit and bash how supposedly bad the west is. Each region has top players the east just has a little more depth than the west. When a team can run four lines compared to two lines it doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure how who is gonna win the majority of the time.

  4. 4-2 RR...final score.

    I can admit when I'm wrong, and I thought RR would win easily by double digits. I give credit where credit is due, and Williston put up a great fight. Looks like RR's experience took over in the end and lead them to victory over Williston.

    Well done Coyotes. Nothing to be ashamed of. Williston may not have the depth, the flashy talent, but they played with a lot of heart and effort. Although the West did not win a game this year in the first round this year I hope they showed a few of you people on here a thing or two.

  5. I just have to poise this question out to everyone. I know this is only 2 periods of hockey, however where have all the west bashers went?? A team like Century playing South to a one goal game through 2 is pretty impressive. Now, in all honesty South could come out and put up 4 or 5 in the third on them, but I think some of you better take back a few of your statements about how big a gap there is from the west and east. Granted the east has a lot more depth them the west, but there are still many good players from the west past and present. Give a little respect where it is due.

×
×
  • Create New...