Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

gordwiser

Members
  • Posts

    87
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by gordwiser

  1. Does anyone have interest in this handmade cradle with Sioux emblems?  My wife wants it out of the house and I can't in good conscience throw it away.  Made by my father in law, basically new, we never really used it, just been in the basement for awhile.

    We're in Rogers, MN

     

    PXL_20210523_162017365.jpg

  2. 2 hours ago, SJHovey said:

    St. Cloud swept Duluth in St. Cloud a couple of weeks ago. Tough at home.

    UND always has a tough time in Clown... and the games are battles.  I've taken in most of the series there for the last 15 years and the last "easy" win I remember for the Sioux was ten years ago.  I think the only sweep by either team during that time was in 2016, which is pretty remarkable. 

    Sioux didn't play poorly... flat out dominated during stretches... a few things to clean up, but given the history of their games at the concrete palace, I wouldn't be too worried with the results this weekend. 

    • Upvote 2
  3. 15 hours ago, SiouxHawkGuy said:

    If this was the Old Ralph... UND would be #1... the New Ralph.... meh.  Don't get me wrong, I still love going to games, and now taking my kids there, but I would trade 100 games at the new arena to be a part of some of those game atmospheres at the old place.

    • Like 3
  4. not that this should be brought up again as it happened awhile ago but the coaches are only allowed to say certain things because of the law the rest should have been said by the parents.

    Additionally, Kristo isn't a minor, the parents aren't allowed to say anything either, medically anyway.

  5. How much do we owe Karl Goerhing for bringing Dell along. Dell wasn't very good last year. This year he's the best in the country.

    I don't think this is coincidence. Goerhing was small and had to be positionally sound and could make the highlight save on occasion. Dell isn't as small, but he has been the other two. Three months ago after seeing Dell play in person I felt the best about our goalie situation since Goerhing was tending the net.

  6. DaveK - Here is a picture of it that I added to my post that you responded to: Picture of Michigan Goal vs. UNO

    I can't believe you think that is conclusive evidence... an angled shot from 200 feet away? What if the puck was slightly elevated? The angle would show white under the puck, but not whether the white was from the puck over the line.

    Agree to disagree, because after watching the replay 100 times from all the angles I still don't see conclusive evidence. I agree that it probably was, but I'm not convinced it was.

  7. This post disposes of the issue. The rule doesn't say to use your common sense...it says you must clearly see it cross the line to be a goal on replay...in addition, they are to use the overhead camera only...on that view, you cannot meet the standard...I think it's the puck but I cannot be sure...therefore ....no goal.

    In NCAA tourney play you can use any camera angle/view/replay available.

    Also, to DaveK, this is not a "damned if they do, damned if they don't" situation for the refs. As stated above, the rule is clear. There has to be conclusive evidence. There is no "spirit" of the rule to enforce. If it was called a goal on the ice it should have stood because there wasn't enough to overturn it, but it wasn't called a goal on the ice.

    • Upvote 1
×
×
  • Create New...