Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

UNDSIOUX

Members
  • Posts

    17
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by UNDSIOUX

  1. To claim that this wouldn't hurt the competition level in RR/GFC and all of local high school hockey is just a dumb argument, it would level the playing field and GF/Fargo might not be the powerhouses we're used to being in HS hockey, but in terms of what it can bring to the city I am not opposed to it at all... Heck we have more than adequate facilities here to house a team so why not. Plus it would add a really good local recruiting ground for UND/The Sioux/The Whioux/or whatever we're called in the future. Sure we'll get a few kids that are here because of their rich parents, but it would allow some of the great products from GFC/RR and other local towns to stay here for high school and play on this team instead of moving to play Juniors somewhere else. There are obvious pros and cons of if we were to get a team, but ultiimately in this case I think if we can, we should.

  2. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought I heard somewhere that Maris was getting his degree or something at UND this spring and moving back to Colorado instead of returning next season.

    I'm not sure where you heard that because I have never heard a single thing about that from ANYONE.

    I heart that as well GFG, I can't remember where or when so I guess I lack credibility, but I heard the exact same thing you did about 3/4 months ago.

  3. Does anyone know if Di Puma is going to be eligible to come this year or not? Was his situation similar to St Clair's or not? We(or at least I) feel like my questions about St Clair have been answered, but when people ask about Di Puma there is never see an answer.

  4. Crisfield isn't coming in next year. At least I don't think so.

    If he does my guess is he redshirts. I don't see him getting much playing time since we're pretty well off at defense right now, but I just put him in there because he's a 1993 and Koules is planning on coming this year(last I heard anyway) and he's a 1994 born. I don't know the inside scoop on all of this though, I'm just making guesses.

  5. Here's my guess(from a long ways out and with a long time for players to come and go still haha)

    Nelson – Knight - Kristo

    Rodwell - Grimaldi - Rowney

    MacMillan – Parks - O'Donnell

    St Clair – Pattyn – Gaarder

    Forbort – Schmaltz

    MacWilliam - Mattson

    Simpson - Panzarella

    Goalies: Dell, Saunders, Gothberg

    Extras: Senkbeil, Gleason, Macmillan, Koules, Chyzyk, Ladue, Crisfield?

  6. So right now what do you guys think our roster will look like next year with our class of recruits? Correct me if I'm wrong, but we have 4 openings as of now (3 seniors, Tate Maris leaving, and IF Knight, Nelson, Kristo, Dell, Forbert, all stay and noone transfers?)

  7. I am trying to find the game on my XBOX 360 on the ESPN app and I can't find it... I can find the previews for the Air Force/BC game, the Minnesota/BU game, and so on, but the UND/Western Michigan game isn't there... I guess if it isn't there I'll be watching it on FSN?

  8. If you haven't listened to what Hak said, you should. It's 15 minutes and it's at UNDsports.com.

    http://www.fightings...TCLID=205380595

    He lays out the facts. He makes it pretty clear that if the name is kept we'll lose control of too many other things, like being on sanctions, not being able to schedule certain (cough Wisconsin, Minnesota cough) schools, and it will, to his estimation, cost us a slot in the Big Sky.

    Like he says, keep control of the name and lose control of all that or give up the name and control items that are critical to the success of UND Athletics in Division I.

    It would be a bummer to not have UW and UM play us in hockey, but honestly I do find myself getting sick of UM's "dish it out but can't take it" attitude on the ice and by half of their fanbase, and UW was the driving force behind the B1G hockey. Also the notion that UM will only play us at their home ice is a dream they need to give up. In all other sports, they could pull that off, but in hockey we are equals(IMO UND is the more storied hockey school, but that is a matter of opinion), so we will be alternating those games home/away each year.

    Don't get me wrong, I do hope we play each other every year, I was just saying that those institutions seem to think they walk on water and can have a condescending attitude towards everyone else.

    • Upvote 1
  9. I say for now leave it retired and go as North Dakota until the SL lawsuit has run it's course. If SL wins, I say that we reinstate the name, if SL loses I say we decide if we want a new logo/nickname or we decide if we should just stay as North Dakota. It will be a few years before the lawsuit is done and I'm sure not everyone will be ok with moving on to a new logo/nickname right away so we can just stay as North Dakota for a few years and see if eventually a name starts to stick or if we need to make a nickname. Lastly, if we become the North Dakota Flames I will lose my damn mind... I don't want to be referred to as the "flamers" by all of our rivals.

×
×
  • Create New...