Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum
jk

2020 Dumpster Fire (Enter at your own risk)

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said:

https://www.oregonlive.com/crime/2020/09/portland-police-chief-chuck-lovell-speaks-about-police-plans-for-proud-boys-rally-on-saturday-watch-live-at-2-pm.html

The rallies are 3 miles apart, didn't realize that was the case until now. 

I think shutting down the protests at first would have bad optics, but if you give a mouse a cookie...

I'd amend that to "planned for 3 miles apart."

One group will go antagonize the other.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Bison Dan said:

Please explain to us how you would stop whole sale fraud in mail in ballots when: 

1.  Some states are mailing out unsolicited ballots to every reg. voter.  So what happens to the ballots that go to dead people or people that have moved?

2.  Some states are not requiring any vertification - signature doesn't matter, etc.

3.  Some states are going to count for up to 14 days after the election.

 

They already have ballots that have been thrown away.  

Why would Trump not be worried about a fair election.

 

Study up on how vote-by-mail actually works.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, UNDBIZ said:

I'd amend that to "planned for 3 miles apart."

One group will go antagonize the other.

They called in state troopers to help keep them apart. Would be great to see some success on the part of law enforcement here. Which will of course not be the narrative if it's the case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, MrEdway said:

Not the most neutral source around, but with the exception of Mr Drive-by Mike, most people would acknowledge that while massive mail fraud has not been an issue in the past, the general nature of it along with this being one of the most contentious elections ever makes it an area that could be exploited.  

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said:

They think (mindread?) that Trump wants to use the military in the election. 

He's already sent them into cities without state/local approval, no? And it was beyond the scope of "protecting federal property".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jdub27 said:

He's already sent them into cities without state/local approval, no? And it was beyond the scope of "protecting federal property".

Which is unfortunate because he did it with the support of most of the citizens in those areas who were being held hostage by their local leftist leadership.  

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, TheFlop said:

Which is unfortunate because he did it with the support of most of the citizens in those areas who were being held hostage by their local leftist leadership.  

Source?  Genuinely curious.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, mikejm said:

Study up on how vote-by-mail actually works.

Holy hell I have repeatedly given you and others FACTS and hard timeline scenarios on exactly how this works, the potential areas of compromise and evidence of the process beeaking down, and being abused and manipulated. 

The repeated stupidity of not being able to recognize how massively this process will be used to manipulate the election is astonishing. So much so that the repeated blindness can not be accidental.

Yet you still spout off arrogant talking points thinking you have some magic superior knowledge.

You have talking points, sheepled into your incapable of learning brain.

You are insane. I'll help you again, but not until you demonstrate knowledge in the 1st and most basic area.

Just because you keep saying something again and again, this does not make it true.

Get. Help.

 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Governor Kristi Noem pushes back against MSDNC’s Moscow Maddow. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Goon said:

Governor Kristi Noem pushes back against MSDNC’s Moscow Maddow. 

 

 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, TheFlop said:

219 total deaths in the state since the start 6-7 months ago.....over half of them in nursing homes...but yet people are still losing their minds.  Unbelievable.  

https://www.grandforksherald.com/newsmd/coronavirus/6678422-North-Dakotas-spike-in-COVID-19-deaths-continues-as-active-cases-hit-record-high-again

Quote

The eight residents were all between 60-99 years old and had underlying health conditions, according to the department.

 

This virus is taking the low hanging fruit.*

 

*Yes, crass, but the virus is targeting the elderly and infirm (meaning those with underlying conditions). 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said:

 

I saw that tweet, that's awesome. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said:

 

This virus is taking the low hanging fruit.*

 

*Yes, crass, but the virus is targeting the elderly and infirm (meaning those with underlying conditions). 

Let’s say we have a serial killer on the loose. Up to this point, the killer has exclusively targeted women, in bars, after 1 am on only Friday nights. Guess how society would respond? I can tell you we wouldn’t close the schools or shut down high school sports.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Frozen4sioux said:

Holy hell I have repeatedly given you and others FACTS and hard timeline scenarios on exactly how this works, the potential areas of compromise and evidence of the process beeaking down, and being abused and manipulated. 

The repeated stupidity of not being able to recognize how massively this process will be used to manipulate the election is astonishing. So much so that the repeated blindness can not be accidental.

Yet you still spout off arrogant talking points thinking you have some magic superior knowledge.

You have talking points, sheepled into your incapable of learning brain.

You are insane. I'll help you again, but not until you demonstrate knowledge in the 1st and most basic area.

Just because you keep saying something again and again, this does not make it true.

Get. Help.

ROTFLMAO!

Take a look at Colorado voting, which since 2013 has been entirely by mail. 8.06 million ballots cast statewide and you know how many people have been convicted of voter fraud in that period?

NINE.

That's 0.000111687792 percent. Extrapolate that onto the 2016 presidential vote and you'll expect to find 144 fraudulent ballots nationwide.

Do you really want to hang onto that 'manipulate the election' theory?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, mikejm said:

ROTFLMAO!

Take a look at Colorado voting, which since 2013 has been entirely by mail. 8.06 million ballots cast statewide and you know how many people have been convicted of voter fraud in that period?

NINE.

That's 0.000111687792 percent. Extrapolate that onto the 2016 presidential vote and you'll expect to find 144 fraudulent ballots nationwide.

Do you really want to hang onto that 'manipulate the election' theory?

give up, you just are not keeping up with the conversation

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, mikejm said:

ROTFLMAO!

Take a look at Colorado voting, which since 2013 has been entirely by mail. 8.06 million ballots cast statewide and you know how many people have been convicted of voter fraud in that period?

NINE.

That's 0.000111687792 percent. Extrapolate that onto the 2016 presidential vote and you'll expect to find 144 fraudulent ballots nationwide.

Do you really want to hang onto that 'manipulate the election' theory?

Is that a small, acceptable percentage for you? That’s a larger number than the fatality rate for covid under 20.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, The Sicatoka said:

This virus is taking the low hanging fruit.*

*Yes, crass, but the virus is targeting the elderly and infirm (meaning those with underlying conditions). 

For the most part, you are exactly right, excluding the unknown of any long-term effects for those that don't get sick enough for hospitalization but still show symptoms.

What it boils down to: If you are in favor with doing our best to protect the vulnerable (which we are already doing) while letting everyone go back to normal life (which will speed how fast the virus transmits to everyone, including the protected vulnerable because they will still end up exposed), then just admit you are fine with the virus taking the elderly and infirm at a multiple that it is currently happening while work towards reaching some sort of end goal (likely vaccine/herd immunity).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jdub27 said:

For the most part, you are exactly right, excluding the unknown of any long-term effects for those that don't get sick enough for hospitalization but still show sypmtoms.

What it boils down to: If you are in favor with doing our best to protect the vulnerable (which we are already doing) while letting everyone go back to normal life (which will speed how fast the virus transmits to everyone, including the protected vulnerable because they will still end up exposed), then just admit you are fine with the virus taking the elderly and infirm at a multiple that it is currently happening while reaching some sort of end goal at some poing (vaccine/herd immunity).

And explain to us then how the approach you laid out at the end to vilify many here is different than our approach to influenza each year. We sacrifice a percentage of people each year so life can go on, knowing people would be saved if we did things differently.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Bison06 said:

Is that a small, acceptable percentage for you? That’s a larger number than the fatality rate for covid under 20.

check your math

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Bison06 said:

image.png.bdca34eca0f91b8497474ec13a7ab976.png
 

Lol.  If the risk is to great to get back into school in CO, should it not be to great to vote by mail??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TheFlop said:

219 total deaths in the state since the start 6-7 months ago.....over half of them in nursing homes...but yet people are still losing their minds.  Unbelievable.  

https://www.grandforksherald.com/newsmd/coronavirus/6678422-North-Dakotas-spike-in-COVID-19-deaths-continues-as-active-cases-hit-record-high-again

I think it is very believable that you've lost your mind.  

It is, after all, helpful when joining a cult. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, mikejm said:

ROTFLMAO!

Take a look at Colorado voting, which since 2013 has been entirely by mail. 8.06 million ballots cast statewide and you know how many people have been convicted of voter fraud in that period?

NINE.

That's 0.000111687792 percent. Extrapolate that onto the 2016 presidential vote and you'll expect to find 144 fraudulent ballots nationwide.

Do you really want to hang onto that 'manipulate the election' theory?

Drive by Mike is back....Here's 7 already in one close county alone in Pennsylvania.....all were Trump ballots that were mysteriously tossed.  Want to extrapolate those results out considering just a minute fraction of people have voted yet?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/pennsylvania-military-ballots-mail-voting-2020-election/

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...