Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum
jk

2020 Dumpster Fire (Enter at your own risk)

Recommended Posts

Let's just call it what it is - they are using Biden to get the first female President in office.  

 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Hayduke1 said:

Hey, cultists.  Trump called his wife "ugly". 

A double dose of hypocrisy.

 

FB_IMG_1600645148357.jpg

How's the meltdown going? Lolololololorotflmaorotlfmao.  The way I see it one more Trump nominee should put the brakes on the far left b.s. in this country for at least another 10 years. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, TheFlop said:

How's the meltdown going? Lolololololorotflmaorotlfmao.  The way I see it one more Trump nominee should put the breaks on the far left b.s. in this country for at least another 10 years. 

We will see how things "brake", cultist.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/andrewsolender/2020/09/20/murkowski-joins-collins-in-opposing-supreme-court-vote-before-election--heres-who-matters-now/

Murkowski Joins Collins In Opposing Supreme Court Vote Before Election – Here's Who Matters Now

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, UNDBIZ said:

Likely looking at a lame duck session confirmation. 

A second 4 year term and control of the senate is hardly lame duck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, UNDBIZ said:

Likely looking at a lame duck session confirmation. 

There is a curveball to this.  Since Arizona’s senate race is a special election, they can seat their senator by Nov 30th.  If McSally loses (which right now is likely to happen), it would give the Rs less margin of error.

So I would expect an attempt made between Nov 4th and nov 29th.  
 

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, Hayduke1 said:

We will see how things "brake", cultist.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/andrewsolender/2020/09/20/murkowski-joins-collins-in-opposing-supreme-court-vote-before-election--heres-who-matters-now/

Murkowski Joins Collins In Opposing Supreme Court Vote Before Election – Here's Who Matters Now

"Before" the election being the key term...........gonna get to have their cake by being re-elected AND then get to vote in a new SCOTUS.........rotflmaolmaorotflololololrotflmao

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Worship the orange god and praise the creed of hypocrisy.

 

2016, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas): “It has been 80 years since a Supreme Court vacancy was nominated and confirmed in an election year. There is a long tradition that you don’t do this in an election year.” 

2018, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.): “If an opening comes in the last year of President Trump’s term, and the primary process has started, we’ll wait to the next election.”

2016, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.): “I don’t think we should be moving on a nominee in the last year of this president’s term - I would say that if it was a Republican president.”

2016, Sen. David Perdue (R-Ga.): “The very balance of our nation’s highest court is in serious jeopardy. As a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, I will do everything in my power to encourage the president and Senate leadership not to start this process until we hear from the American people.”

2016, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa): “A lifetime appointment that could dramatically impact individual freedoms and change the direction of the court for at least a generation is too important to get bogged down in politics. The American people shouldn’t be denied a voice.” 

2016, Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.): “The campaign is already under way. It is essential to the institution of the Senate and to the very health of our republic to not launch our nation into a partisan, divisive confirmation battle during the very same time the American people are casting their ballots to elect our next president.”

2016, Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.): “In this election year, the American people will have an opportunity to have their say in the future direction of our country. For this reason, I believe the vacancy left open by Justice Antonin Scalia should not be filled until there is a new president.” 

2016, Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.): “The Senate should not confirm a new Supreme Court justice until we have a new president.”

2016, Sen. Cory Gardner (R-Col.): “I think we’re too close to the election. The president who is elected in November should be the one who makes this decision.”

2016, Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio): “I believe the best thing for the country is to trust the American people to weigh in on who should make a lifetime appointment that could reshape the Supreme Court for generations. This wouldn’t be unusual. It is common practice for the Senate to stop acting on lifetime appointments during the last year of a presidential term, and it’s been nearly 80 years since any president was permitted to immediately fill a vacancy that arose in a presidential election year.”

2016, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.): “I strongly agree that the American people should decide the future direction of the Supreme Court by their votes for president and the majority party in the U.S. Senate.”

“The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.”
Mitch McConnell, March 2016

 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Once again, after all the Russia, impeachment, and Kavanaugh bullsh*t that resulted in nothing, the Rs should tell them to pound sand.

They kept RBG alive as long as possible but couldn't quite pull it off.

  • Upvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Hayduke1 said:

Worship the orange god and praise the creed of hypocrisy.

 

2016, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas): “It has been 80 years since a Supreme Court vacancy was nominated and confirmed in an election year. There is a long tradition that you don’t do this in an election year.” 

2018, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.): “If an opening comes in the last year of President Trump’s term, and the primary process has started, we’ll wait to the next election.”

2016, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.): “I don’t think we should be moving on a nominee in the last year of this president’s term - I would say that if it was a Republican president.”

2016, Sen. David Perdue (R-Ga.): “The very balance of our nation’s highest court is in serious jeopardy. As a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, I will do everything in my power to encourage the president and Senate leadership not to start this process until we hear from the American people.”

2016, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa): “A lifetime appointment that could dramatically impact individual freedoms and change the direction of the court for at least a generation is too important to get bogged down in politics. The American people shouldn’t be denied a voice.” 

2016, Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.): “The campaign is already under way. It is essential to the institution of the Senate and to the very health of our republic to not launch our nation into a partisan, divisive confirmation battle during the very same time the American people are casting their ballots to elect our next president.”

2016, Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.): “In this election year, the American people will have an opportunity to have their say in the future direction of our country. For this reason, I believe the vacancy left open by Justice Antonin Scalia should not be filled until there is a new president.” 

2016, Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.): “The Senate should not confirm a new Supreme Court justice until we have a new president.”

2016, Sen. Cory Gardner (R-Col.): “I think we’re too close to the election. The president who is elected in November should be the one who makes this decision.”

2016, Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio): “I believe the best thing for the country is to trust the American people to weigh in on who should make a lifetime appointment that could reshape the Supreme Court for generations. This wouldn’t be unusual. It is common practice for the Senate to stop acting on lifetime appointments during the last year of a presidential term, and it’s been nearly 80 years since any president was permitted to immediately fill a vacancy that arose in a presidential election year.”

2016, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.): “I strongly agree that the American people should decide the future direction of the Supreme Court by their votes for president and the majority party in the U.S. Senate.”

“The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.”
Mitch McConnell, March 2016

 

The American people voted in 2018 to give an expanded Senate majority to the GOP. They have a mandate.

Should also be noted that several of them mention "a new President." We knew in 2016 we'd have a new President. Here, we do not know that.

At the end of the day, it really doesn't matter though. Donald Trump will nominate someone this week, and the Senate will vote yes or vote no.

We have a GOP president and a GOP Senate, lets roll!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Haydouche thinking he would get to see a far left judge replace RBG.......she should have pulled the plug when Obama was in office if she wanted a guarantee a liberal would fill her spot. 

There's a lesson for you to learn here.  When you repeatedly act like a jerk to a person.....over and over....for the better part of 4 years....when the person that you were being a jerk to has a chance to return the "favor"....they more often than not will.  Trump isn't gonna give Dems any break after what they have put him through.  

giphy-downsized-large_(1).gif

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FACT:    22 Presidents, and 29 times, there has been an opening on the Supreme Court within 3 months of a Presidential election. All 29 times, the President of the United States has made a nomination.

Every single time! So don't read into this and say Trump is doing something unethical.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, JohnboyND7 said:

The American people voted in 2018 to give an expanded Senate majority to the GOP. They have a mandate.

Should also be noted that several of them mention "a new President." We knew in 2016 we'd have a new President. Here, we do not know that.

At the end of the day, it really doesn't matter though. Donald Trump will nominate someone this week, and the Senate will vote yes or vote no.

We have a GOP president and a GOP Senate, lets roll!

What a load of bull$%!#, cultist.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, sioux rube said:

FACT:    22 Presidents, and 29 times, there has been an opening on the Supreme Court within 3 months of a Presidential election. All 29 times, the President of the United States has made a nomination.

Every single time! So don't read into this and say Trump is doing something unethical.

Really, Sue's Lube?  

BS. 

Cultists parrot Trump's ethics.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Hayduke1 said:

What a load of bull$%!#, cultist.

Instead of the silly color schemed rating system for Covid I think it would be better used to rank what level of breakdown you are at. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, UND1983 said:

Once again, after all the Russia, impeachment, and Kavanaugh bullsh*t that resulted in nothing, the Rs should tell them to pound sand.

They kept RBG alive as long as possible but couldn't quite pull it off.

Least it didn't get to this stage.......

4c287506617868f173b90ca2864065eddc01a42fb6fc66e2d13d640efa7823f3.jpg

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hypocricy is the GOP. 

https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/19/opinions/rbg-supreme-court-gop-hypocrisy-avlon/index.html

 

Before Trump, Republicans talked a lot about values and character. They talked about preserving our institutions and traditions. It's not an argument that is operative today. Instead, situational ethics have been weaponized in Washington. And the stakes are always highest when a Supreme Court pick is involved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Hayduke1 said:

Here is your "stable genius" cultists.

Yup. 

He is that smart.  

https://www.forbes.com/sites/tommybeer/2020/09/20/trump-threatens-to-issue-executive-order-preventing-biden-from-being-elected-president/#4b725a1576f6

Trump Threatens To Issue Executive Order Preventing Biden From Being Elected President

 That was a joke...lol

You should listen for yourself Soyboy instead of just cutting & pasting

You gonna make it until 11/3?  You seem much more triggered than usual.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Goon said:

Plugs Biden says that 200 million have died of COVID-19.

 

What is he talking about 200 million people died... did he mean 200 K..  the guy struggles to even finish a complete sentence.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...