Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum
jk

2020 Dumpster Fire (Enter at your own risk)

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Hayduke1 said:

Why are you such a lying POS?

Show me one false statement.

Just one.

You've never been able to do that. For anybody here, ever, it always the same,  just get destroyed like a K Harris resume during her job interviews, then call people names, is this how you get your way when mommy takes the sega away?... with name calling and rage?

Does it work? Do you get your genesis back? Does it make things true and false out of your hopes and cries?

 

 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said:

Attacking the wording means you can't refute the message.

"When there is a vacancy on the SCOTUS, the President is to nominate someone, the Senate is to consider that nomination... There's no unwritten law that says that it can only be done on off-years. That's not in the Constitution text."

Barrack Hussain Obama  2016

Attack the above.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Frozen4sioux said:

Kamala slept with anything and everything ro get positions in and out of politics. FACT.

I support equal and fair opportunity for all. You should, as a leftist, have been told that this type of slut whore is the opposite of the #metoo movement's ideals and goals.

Why do you support such behavior? This is aweful and needs to be canceled from society, instead your failed upbringing has brought you to support such a system,.........it's sad.

Be better

Was this a normal behavior for the women in your life?

Is this how you support avenues for women to advance in the work structure you are engaged in?

It must have been so confusing? 

Sorry for not prefacing with a trigger warning. Sheesh. Just because you have to pay for sex doesn't mean everyone else sees it as transactional. Do you feel the same way about Guilfoyle?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MrEdway said:

"When there is a vacancy on the SCOTUS, the President is to nominate someone, the Senate is to consider that nomination... There's no unwritten law that says that it can only be done on off-years. That's not in the Constitution text."

Barrack Hussain Obama  2016

Attack the above.

I don't hold Obama in particularly high regard. Voted McCain (but not religious weirdo Romney).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, homer said:

I think the difficult part is can you be confident when the shoe is on the other foot it wouldn’t happen?  

If you leadership can’t follow their recommendation/laws of wearing masks at beauty saloons could they follow the gentlemen agreement not to add a Supreme Court justice?

Won't miss her one bit whenever we are finally rid of her.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said:

Sorry for not prefacing with a trigger warning. Sheesh. Just because you have to pay for sex doesn't mean everyone else sees it as transactional. Do you feel the same way about Guilfoyle?

So this IS how you do things at work? You approve?

I notice you cant dispute the facts.. or bring any legitimate argument to the table in any way.....just lay out baseless insults.. and literally make my points for us, fairly typical and expected, boring really, no matter which name you use, it just keeps coming down to the fact... you got nothing, and it eats you, to the core...

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Frozen4sioux said:

Show me one false statement.

Just one.

You've never been able to do that. For anybody here, ever, it always the same,  just get destroyed like a K Harris resume during her job interviews, then call people names, is this how you get your way when mommy takes the sega away?... with name calling and rage?

Does it work? Do you get your genesis back? Does it make things true and false out of your hopes and cries?

 

 

Worst day of Hayduke's life.

 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said:

Sorry for not prefacing with a trigger warning. Sheesh. Just because you have to pay for sex doesn't mean everyone else sees it as transactional. Do you feel the same way about Guilfoyle?

i must have missed it...is guilfoyle running for office somewhere?

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Frozen4sioux said:

Screenshot_20200919-193416_TikTok.thumb.jpg.a01e51013fe5b65df1b77d6bd1238cb4.jpg

Inconvenient. But....  lies........ rite...rite...amirite

Chuck is such a hack.  2016 Trump was a elected to nominate. conservative judges.

Senate elected to confirm.

Thank God we have both now to nominate and confirm.

Reverse it and Dems would in a heart beat.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Frozen4sioux said:

Show me one false statement.

Just one.

You've never been able to do that. For anybody here, ever, it always the same,  just get destroyed like a K Harris resume during her job interviews, then call people names, is this how you get your way when mommy takes the sega away?... with name calling and rage?

Does it work? Do you get your genesis back? Does it make things true and false out of your hopes and cries?

 

 

For the record and to "double down" and help the slow folk catch up..

K Harris resume = one of her orifices...

Her "Job interviews" = what she's done with those orafices to get a position she wasn't qualified for.

Those. Are. Facts.

#whathappenedtoMetoo ?

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said:

To focus on their own campaigns. Collins having to vote pretty much seals her fate.

So you are suggesting senators can't do their jobs and campaign at the same time? For what its worth, she doesn't want to do it this fall.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't care for Kamala Harris at all, and her appointments to insurance appeal and medical assistance boards in the 1990s by her sugar daddy politician don't help that opinion.

But DAMN---now I gotta give her credit!  Did not realize that's what she had to do to get 140,000 people to elect her District Attorney in 2003; 4,500,000 people to elect her Attorney General in 2010; and 7,500,000 people to elect her Senator in 2016!

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Frozen4sioux said:

So this IS how you do things at work? You approve?

I notice you cant dispute the facts.. or bring any legitimate argument to the table in any way.....just lay out baseless insults.. and literally make my points for us, fairly typical and expected, boring really, no matter which name you use, it just keeps coming down to the fact... you got nothing, and it eats you, to the core...

 

For the last few years, whenever Trump talks about forest management being a problem, it frustrates me to no end when liberals say that what is saying is wrong. While Trump doesn't understand forestry, he is correct (at least on a macro level) that we need to change our approach. Decades of fire suppression have made forest fires bigger. Liberals end up forcing me to defend what Trump says, and it pain me to have to do so.

Now, you are forcing me to do so with feminists. Attacking a woman for who she sleeps with is a ridiculous double standard men are not subjected to. Who are you to say whether or not Kamala had true feelings for these men? Would you congratulate a man for sleeping with a powerful woman, or marrying the daughter of a business owner and getting a cushy job? Feminists are wrong about a lot, and many of them articulate it incorrectly, but it is absolutely true that your attacks on her are a mysoginistic double standard.

She is a lousy person in my eyes. Yet another hypocritical politician: says she smoked pot to seem relatable, but also locked people up for doing so. But who she has dated doesn't matter to me. For you to focus on that is your problem; saying that it "eats at me" is so incredibly obvious as a projection on your part. Women reject you, and this is how it manifests.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, JohnboyND7 said:

So you are suggesting senators can't do their jobs and campaign at the same time? For what its worth, she doesn't want to do it this fall.

Certainly a distraction from discussing other topics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said:

For the last few years, whenever Trump talks about forest management being a problem, it frustrates me to no end when liberals say that what is saying is wrong. While Trump doesn't understand forestry, he is correct (at least on a macro level) that we need to change our approach. Decades of fire suppression have made forest fires bigger. Liberals end up forcing me to defend what Trump says, and it pain me to have to do so.

Now, you are forcing me to do so with feminists. Attacking a woman for who she sleeps with is a ridiculous double standard men are not subjected to. Who are you to say whether or not Kamala had true feelings for these men? Would you congratulate a man for sleeping with a powerful woman, or marrying the daughter of a business owner and getting a cushy job? Feminists are wrong about a lot, and many of them articulate it incorrectly, but it is absolutely true that your attacks on her are a mysoginistic double standard.

She is a lousy person in my eyes. Yet another hypocritical politician: says she smoked pot to seem relatable, but also locked people up for doing so. But who she has dated doesn't matter to me. For you to focus on that is your problem; saying that it "eats at me" is so incredibly obvious as a projection on your part. Women reject you, and this is how it manifests.

A friend of mine who will be voting Trump this Fall made similar remarks about Harris, and he literally said he could not support someone with that "lifestyle".  After I reminded him that Melania was wife number #3, the silent look of embarrassment on his face that followed was priceless.

Harris is indeed "yet another hypocritical politician" with so many flaws to point out.  I don't understand why then folks even bother bringing up that aspect of her life.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said:

Certainly a distraction from discussing other topics.

This is the Senate's job. They only have 2 jobs. One, pass legislation, and two, confirm judges.

There is literally zero reasons these people should not confirm the judge. Libs made it very clear in 2016 how they felt on the topic EVEN WHEN THEY DIDNT CONTROL THE SENATE. Anyone who tries implying the GOP is not fully entitled and genuinely in a defensible position here is not a serious person and I am think you might fall under that camp lol. 

Always breaks my heart to realize we have stupid people with ties to my home state.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Frozen4sioux said:

Kamala slept with anything and everything ro get positions in and out of politics. FACT.

I support equal and fair opportunity for all. You should, as a leftist, have been told that this type of slut whore is the opposite of the #metoo movement's ideals and goals.

Why do you support such behavior? This is aweful and needs to be canceled from society, instead your failed upbringing has brought you to support such a system,.........it's sad.

Be better

Was this a normal behavior for the women in your life?

Is this how you support avenues for women to advance in the work structure you are engaged in?

It must have been so confusing? 

Now do trump. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Frozen4sioux said:

So this IS how you do things at work? You approve?

I notice you cant dispute the facts.. or bring any legitimate argument to the table in any way.....just lay out baseless insults.. and literally make my points for us, fairly typical and expected, boring really, no matter which name you use, it just keeps coming down to the fact... you got nothing, and it eats you, to the core...

 

Again, why are such a lying POS?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, JohnboyND7 said:

This is the Senate's job. They only have 2 jobs. One, pass legislation, and two, confirm judges.

There is literally zero reasons these people should not confirm the judge. Libs made it very clear in 2016 how they felt on the topic EVEN WHEN THEY DIDNT CONTROL THE SENATE. Anyone who tries implying the GOP is not fully entitled and genuinely in a defensible position here is not a serious person and I am think you might fall under that camp lol. 

Always breaks my heart to realize we have stupid people with ties to my home state.

and hypocrites.  Look in a mirror.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

“I want you to use my words against me. If there’s a Republican president in 2016 and a vacancy occurs in the last year of the first term, you can say Lindsey Graham said let’s let the next president, whoever it might be, make that nomination." -Lindsey Graham, March 2016

"The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president." - Mitch McConnell, 2016

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...