Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum
jk

2020 Dumpster Fire (Enter at your own risk)

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, TheFlop said:

It's ok Haydouche, rest assured the new Trump appointed replacement for RBG will continue to allow you to identify as a fool.  

I see.

Just like you do everyday with no hope of change of that status. 

Like is tough in the cult.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, JohnboyND7 said:

What are you talking about

Hey non related, but our Irish are killing it today!  

Back to the dumpster fire....

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said:

It's funny seeing all the half-baked justifications for why it's different this time, but at least you're willing to admit yours is for hyper-partisan reasons.

it is different. 

In 2016, we had a Republican Senate with a Democrat President. --> President is operating at the mercy of the opposite party. 

In 2020, we have a GOP Senate and President. Control of the relevant government apparatuses has its perks.

These aren't half-baked justifications, its a fundamentally different situation from 2016. One doesn't need to go to law school to distinguish one from the other. Only an intellectually lazy person would suggest they are the same. 

Rule: if the Senate and Presidency are controlled by the same party, they will consider a SCOTUS pick in an election year.

For hyper-partisan reasons I would ask the Senate to confirm someone as well if only to give all the lib media a middle finger.

Before the lady's body was even cold journos were threatening and encouraging riots, destruction, etc. Don't threaten me with a good time lol. Let's get it done guys!

Amy Coney Barrett would be ideal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, JohnboyND7 said:

For hyper-partisan reasons I would ask the Senate to confirm someone as well if only to give all the lib media a middle finger.

More of the <insert short sighted decision here> to own the libs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said:

More of the <insert short sighted decision here> to own the libs.

What's short sighted about a President nominating a judge and the Senate confirming a judge?

Libs are threatening violence. The only sensible thing to do is move forward and get it done when the other side is threatening violence. No need to be held captive by a noisy bunch of babies lol

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2016 the country faced a clear choice as the next nominator.

There WAS going to be a new president. The arrogant ingnorant left ASSumed they had the election in hand.

This year there is a strong possibility that the same guy will be president come January.

Back then a clear choice of elected government was no longer evident, now there is a current and clear MANDATE of choice for who we as a country wanted to choose our justices.

Also this argument the repubs have flipped their position is ludicrous without the equal realization the dems... in this conveluted scenario... ALSO have not flipped their tune. Both have or none have, thats all.

This is a massive difference, if thats not evident to you, again go to your parents and blame them, they failed in raising a competent human.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Frozen4sioux said:

2016 the country faced a clear choice as the next nominator.

There WAS going to be a new president. The arrogant ingnorant left ASSumed they had the election in hand.

This year there is a strong possibility that the same guy will be president come January.

Back then a clear choice of elected government was no longer evident, now there is a current and clear MANDATE of choice for who we as a country wanted to choose our justices.

Also this argument the repubs have flipped their position is ludicrous without the equal realization the dems... in this conveluted scenario... ALSO have not flipped their tune. Both have or none have, thats all.

This is a massive difference, if thats not evident to you, again go to your parents and blame them, they failed in raising a competent human.

plain old BS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, JohnboyND7 said:

What's short sighted about a President nominating a judge and the Senate confirming a judge?

Libs are threatening violence. The only sensible thing to do is move forward and get it done when the other side is threatening violence. No need to be held captive by a noisy bunch of babies lol

Really?

Are you ignorant or paranoid? Or both?

Buy a clue.

https://apnews.com/bdd3b6078e9efadcfcd0be4b65f2362e

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, JohnboyND7 said:

What's short sighted about a President nominating a judge and the Senate confirming a judge?

Libs are threatening violence. The only sensible thing to do is move forward and get it done when the other side is threatening violence. No need to be held captive by a noisy bunch of babies lol

Not waiting suggests a lack of faith in the majority and presidency remaining as is. I don't think they have the votes, but we will see. Either way, don't cry when the tables are turned, MAGA boy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, SIOUXFAN97 said:

I am an ignorant member of the cult of Trump.

You'll never be fixed.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Frozen4sioux said:

2016 the country faced a clear choice as the next nominator.

There WAS going to be a new president. The arrogant ingnorant left ASSumed they had the election in hand.

This year there is a strong possibility that the same guy will be president come January.

Back then a clear choice of elected government was no longer evident, now there is a current and clear MANDATE of choice for who we as a country wanted to choose our justices.

Also this argument the repubs have flipped their position is ludicrous without the equal realization the dems... in this conveluted scenario... ALSO have not flipped their tune. Both have or none have, thats all.

This is a massive difference, if thats not evident to you, again go to your parents and blame them, they failed in raising a competent human.

Your parents failed miserably, as evidenced by your lengthy mysoginistic rant about Kamala. You even doubled down, saying that it was a fact that she is a "slut riding whore", which suggests you don't actually have any experience with sex beyond watching porn. 

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said:

Not waiting suggests a lack of faith in the majority and presidency remaining as is. I don't think they have the votes, but we will see. Either way, don't cry when the tables are turned, MAGA boy.

I think that might be the case.  Too many GOP senators in blue leaning states who may lose anyway, but quickly voting on a conservative anti roe v wade, aca, etc justice would seal their fate. 

We will see. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said:

Your parents failed miserably, as evidenced by your lengthy mysoginistic rant about Kamala. You even doubled down, saying that it was a fact that she is a "slut riding whore", which suggests you don't actually have any experience with sex beyond watching porn. 

He is a freak.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said:

Not waiting suggests a lack of faith in the majority and presidency remaining as is. I don't think they have the votes, but we will see. Either way, don't cry when the tables are turned, MAGA boy.

I think the difficult part is can you be confident when the shoe is on the other foot it wouldn’t happen?  

If you leadership can’t follow their recommendation/laws of wearing masks at beauty saloons could they follow the gentlemen agreement not to add a Supreme Court justice?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said:

Your parents failed miserably, as evidenced by your lengthy mysoginistic rant about Kamala. You even doubled down, saying that it was a fact that she is a "slut riding whore", which suggests you don't actually have any experience with sex beyond watching porn. 

Kamala slept with anything and everything ro get positions in and out of politics. FACT.

I support equal and fair opportunity for all. You should, as a leftist, have been told that this type of slut whore is the opposite of the #metoo movement's ideals and goals.

Why do you support such behavior? This is aweful and needs to be canceled from society, instead your failed upbringing has brought you to support such a system,.........it's sad.

Be better

Was this a normal behavior for the women in your life?

Is this how you support avenues for women to advance in the work structure you are engaged in?

It must have been so confusing? 

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Hayduke1 said:

plain old BS.

Frustrated at being owned with your own tumbling logic....   again... sad... I feel for you.

Joe-Kelly-Visited-A-Giant-Mural-Of-Him-Mocking-The-Houston-Astros.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Hayduke1 said:

 

 

 

FB_IMG_1600541534910.jpg

Pathetic.  The more accurate comparison would be that "because it is possible for a small fraction of people to die in a car accident.....nobody can drive".  Ridiculous logic but expected from you.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said:

Not waiting suggests a lack of faith in the majority and presidency remaining as is. I don't think they have the votes, but we will see. Either way, don't cry when the tables are turned, MAGA boy.

Why would they wait?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, Frozen4sioux said:

Kamala slept with anything and everything ro get positions in and out of politics. FACT.

I support equal and fair opportunity for all. You should, as a leftist, have been told that this type of slut whore is the opposite of the #metoo movement's ideals and goals.

Why do you support such behavior? This is aweful and needs to be canceled from society, instead your failed upbringing has brought you to support such a system,.........it's sad.

Be better

Was this a normal behavior for the women in your life?

Is this how you support avenues for women to advance in the work structure you are engaged in?

It must have been so confusing? 

Why are you such a lying POS?

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Hayduke1 said:

Why are you such a lying POS?

Kamala has a well-earned reputation. Acknowledging that isn't a lie or sexist lol. 

Besides, she's a bigot anyway. No reason to show her respect she doesn't show others.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...