Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum
Sign in to follow this  
Frozen4sioux

Kennedy vs donors... again?

Recommended Posts

On 4/26/2019 at 3:06 PM, zonadub said:

The 14 day vetting period has come and gone... When will the final decision be announced?

Three of nine members of the University of Colorado Board of Regents have publicly stated how they will vote Thursday on the nomination of Mark Kennedy as the next potential president of the CU system.

https://www.inforum.com/news/education/1014024-As-vote-looms-three-Colorado-regents-reveal-votes-on-Kennedy’s-pending-presidency

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, BarnWinterSportsEngelstad said:

Say what you want about Kennedy's qualifications to be President of the University of Colorado, but saying he is not qualified based on his political affiliation is very petty in my opinion.   

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a purple state partisan slugfest and it's disgusting.  

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Siouxperfan7 said:

Say what you want about Kennedy's qualifications to be President of the University of Colorado, but saying he is not qualified based on his political affiliation is very petty in my opinion.   

If Kennedy gets the job because of political supporters, verses his qualifications, is that petty?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, BarnWinterSportsEngelstad said:

If Kennedy gets the job because of political supporters, verses his qualifications, is that petty?

When the Board of Regents, making this decision, is an elected body in today's political climate it was/is bound to be a 3 ring circus regardless of the candidate (s). 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, will they release the results right after the vote?  This needs to be OVER!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎5‎/‎1‎/‎2019 at 11:38 AM, BarnWinterSportsEngelstad said:

If Kennedy gets the job because of political supporters, verses his qualifications, is that petty?

If he doesn't get the job because of political detractors, is that petty?

They voted 9-0 for him to be the Presidential candidate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, petey23 said:

If he doesn't get the job because of political detractors, is that petty?

They voted 9-0 for him to be the Presidential candidate.

Final vote will be 6-3 in favor of Kennedy.   Any takers?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, petey23 said:

If he doesn't get the job because of political detractors, is that petty?

They voted 9-0 for him to be the Presidential candidate.

Long ways to go but - same for Heidi?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Siouxperman8 said:

Long ways to go but - same for Heidi?

I would like to see Heidi go through the application process. Most of the political issues that she falls out of line with most North Dakotans on really don't come into play as a College President. She is smart and personable and knows her way around the political landscape.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you dont need the volume just turn to page 568 in the playbook,

follow along and read outloud with chapter 7 titled. Everything is offensive. 

continue with the margin action steps of "How to waste time with public comment"

Should be good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s happening folks!!!! So far 3 votes for kennedy

 

win win for und

 

no buyout and Kennedy leaves 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Siouxperman8 said:

Long ways to go but - same for Heidi?

I would think they would say no for a different reason:  They just might not want another politician in period, whether they have a R or a D by their name. 

Of course it will depend on who is on the committee this time around. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, gfhockey said:

3-3 now 

We need a power play or we dont.... im not sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Cratter said:

I got 2-2.

Gallegos (R) - Yes

Shoemaker (D) - No

Hill (R) - Yes

Smith (D) - No

Ganahl (R) - Yes

I've got 3-2

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...