Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum
cberkas

2018-19 Non-UND College Hockey

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, MafiaMan said:

So Penn State absolutely rolled the Gophers last night...

giphy.gif

Shower.  Repeat.

5-2 8 minutes left in the appropriately named Happy Valley.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am watching the Minnesota and Penn State hockey game and the commentators talked about the Penn State rink using distilled water versus regular water. Apparently makes the ice smoother.

 

Anyone hear that before? What’s The Ralph use?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ryan Poeling is soft, how CC got a penalty for him running the goalie 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, runaroundsioux said:

Pat Micheletti makes me want to stick ice picks in my ears.

Still can’t get over him completely ignoring the 2016 NCAA Hockey Tournament after the opening weekend on “Beyond the Pond.”  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, MafiaMan said:

Still can’t get over him completely ignoring the 2016 NCAA Hockey Tournament after the opening weekend on “Beyond the Pond.”  

Season's over once his Gofers are out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Blackheart said:

Season's over once his Gofers are out.

Yup.  I tried calling into the first show after the 2016 Frozen Four concluded to see if he had any thoughts on the tournament...stunningly enough, was not put on the air.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, LeftyZL said:

I am watching the Minnesota and Penn State hockey game and the commentators talked about the Penn State rink using distilled water versus regular water. Apparently makes the ice smoother.

 

Anyone hear that before? What’s The Ralph use?

Holy water.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, burd said:

Holy water.

Maybe toilet water this year......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK all.....here's a hit in the Kato-Tech game this weekend. 

 

What say you? CFB? Boarding? Major? Minor? I'm still not sure I know.

 

 

 

 

Sorry, I'm not sure if there is a better way to post Twitter posts.

Edited by UNDBIZ
fixed the tweet link

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, bale31 said:

OK all.....here's a hit in the Kato-Tech game this weekend. 

What say you? CFB? Boarding? Major? Minor? I'm still not sure I know.

Looks like he hit him square on the back numbers to me.  Unfortunate spot on the ice too with the glass just starting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, UNDBIZ said:

Looks like he hit him square on the back numbers to me.  Unfortunate spot on the ice too with the glass just starting.

The comments following the tweet were interesting. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Goon said:

The comments following the tweet were interesting. 

That's what has me questioning it. My gut reaction is that it's a major, but I'm just not sure if I"m missing something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What's the NCAA rule book say?

Quote

Rule 50 - Hitting From Behind

50.1 Hitting From Behind - A player shall not push, charge, cross-check or body check an opponent from behind in open ice.
PENALTY—Minor or major at the discretion of the referee.

Hitting from behind into the side boards, end boards or goal cage is a flagrant violation.
PENALTY—Major and game misconduct or disqualification at the discretion of the referee.

Note: The committee reminds coaches and players that the responsibility remains with the player approaching an opponent along the boards in this rule. While players turning to draw penalties are a concern, the positive change in behavior the committee observed outweighs this issue. Any penalty in relation to this rule along the boards or into the goal cage must be a major penalty and a game misconduct. 

To my eyes that was right between the numbers in the back: hitting from behind, and into the side board. 

See above (major) penalty, by rule. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Goon said:

The comments following the tweet were interesting. 

26 minutes ago, bale31 said:

That's what has me questioning it. My gut reaction is that it's a major, but I'm just not sure if I"m missing something.

Seems to me most of the comments outside a few obvious homers support a major being called there, no?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, UNDBIZ said:

Seems to me most of the comments outside a few obvious homers support a major being called there, no?

It was mostly made up of homers. Both Tech homers and MSU homers. It just seemed that the Tech homers were so vehemently opposed to it being called anything.

 

I posted the same thing on GPL and it was 75/25 in favor of a CFB, but there were a decent amount saying it wasn't. I just wasn't sure if my homerism was coming through.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, UNDBIZ said:

Seems to me most of the comments outside a few obvious homers support a major being called there, no?

Yeah, I noticed that. There were a few silly comments, too. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, bale31 said:

It was mostly made up of homers. Both Tech homers and MSU homers. It just seemed that the Tech homers were so vehemently opposed to it being called anything.

 

I posted the same thing on GPL and it was 75/25 in favor of a CFB, but there were a decent amount saying it wasn't. I just wasn't sure if my homerism was coming through.

With the quality of the video, it's hard to say. I'd like to see another angle of the hit. Yes, it's probably a five and a game, but I don't think it's worthy of a suspension. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Goon said:

With the quality of the video, it's hard to say. I'd like to see another angle of the hit. Yes, it's probably a five and a game, but I don't think it's worthy of a suspension. 

Agreed. I didn't even think there was intent. My thought is that it was a couple of guys skating hard for a puck and one guy got a little reckless, but that's what they're trying to take out of the game.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×