Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum
Sign in to follow this  
Fedorov

SIOUX-gopher Saturday Game

Recommended Posts

I have a bad feeling about this one boys.

OK things are feeling (and looking) a little sloppy - is your "bad feeling" contagious (sp) like the flu?

(by the way - that's "boys and girls")

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

J. Parise got away with a trip. However, Bochenski was tripped the same way on the faceoff, so remember that when the goofer fans complain about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK things are feeling (and looking) a little sloppy - is your "bad feeling" contagious (sp) like the flu?

(by the way - that's "boys and girls")

Gophers:

1st 2nd 3rd (goals by period)

31 41 33

Sioux:

1st 2nd 3rd

25 35 50

...keep the faith, our time is yet ahead :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess it is OK to starting calling penalties again when it is against us. The goofers have been trying to start fights, and I think that has thrown us off our game. J. Parise looks off his game and I wouldn't mind Brandt coming in. Let's hope we can have another great third period.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did Rachel Brown just say Minnesota won their first two championships under Lucia with an all-Minnesotan team? :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Did Rachel Brown just say Minnesota won their first two championships under Lucia with an all-Minnesotan team? :D

She said out of state players.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I guess it is OK to starting calling penalties again when it is against us. The goofers have been trying to start fights, and I think that has thrown us off our game. J. Parise looks off his game and I wouldn't mind Brandt coming in. Let's hope we can have another great third period.

I'm not watching the game but TH makes it sound like J. Par is awesome and things could be a lot worse.

Not to worry. Goals by Genoway, Bochenski and an empty netter by Zach have us leaving with another 4-2 win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not watching the game but TH makes it sound like J. Par is awesome and things could be a lot worse.

Not to worry. Goals by Genoway, Bochenski and an empty netter by Zach have us leaving with another 4-2 win.

Unless UND turns it around 180 degrees from the second period im still worried despite UND's third period goal scoring total.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A friend told me it hit a gopher player's shin before murray hit it in? Anyone out there to back this up?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A friend told me it hit a gopher player's shin before murray hit it in? Anyone out there to back this up?

Yes, it definitely came off the vermin crap-sack before another Sioux player touched it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Okay, say it was played with a high stick, but it went off a yellow vermin piece-of-crap, so should'nt the goal count?

I believe so.. but im not saying it for sure hit a gopher first. Just going by what a friend said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was Parise who knocked down the point shot with a high stick. That came before Murray scored, so it was a good call. Doesn't make any difference who it hit after it was touched with a high stick.

Shepard failed sagard's test. Late weak call went against the team trailing (weak call on Schneider) rather than the team with the lead.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It was Parise who knocked down the point shot with a high stick. That came before Murray scored, so it was a good call.

Shepard failed sagard's test. Late weak call went against the team trailing (weak call on Schneider) rather than the team with the lead.

Not disputing that, but it went off of Parise's stick, hit a vermin ass-clown and then was touched by the Sioux, all before going into the net. So what the hell is the proper ruling? Good goal or not? From my understanding, should be good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Woog and Mazacko are morons. Looking at the replay ZP had his stick above the crossbar, but he swung down at the puck. You could clearly tell he hit the puck well below the crossbar. I wasn't looking to see if it hit a gopher player. From one angle it looked like ZP hit it too high, but from the other 3 they showed he clearly hit it below, Wooger and Mazacko ignored the other 3 replays and said it was a great call.

That said the Gopher played well and probably deserved to win, and they had one waived off last night that should not have been. So I can't be too pissed off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tims just said it went off the vermin should have been a good goal! )(&%%#@!%^^ shepherds should all be given their walking papers! Way to officiate a sure split putz. It's amazing that Donnie Lucifer still has any of his soul left to sell to the devil, but apparently he does. Man, I hate it when the Sioux lose to these jerks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hit by Parise with a high stick, goes off Ballard (should of been waived off) and then Murray scores. Its a two two tie in my book. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...