Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Ozzie82

Members
  • Posts

    547
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by Ozzie82

  1. 21 hours ago, SIOUXFAN97 said:

    so you just forget about the previous 7 years or so....JFC some people love mediocrity...still don't have a kicker that i have faith in, kickoffs not thru or to the endzone, muffed punts or punts fair caught inside the 10, missed xtra points.....

    Since you still don't understand what a special teams coach does, here's a c/p from a post I made back in February:

     

    I reached out to an acquaintance of mine, who has coached in the MAC, FCS, and D2, and is currently the head coach at at D3 school in Ohio. I asked him if special teams coaches are supposed to be well versed in kicking and punting techniques; his reply: "No. (the position) has much more to do with the mechanics and execution of the units outside of the specialists themselves. 

    Specialists today are birds of a feather who train and work in their own circles and really work on perfecting there craft in the offseason and really work to maintain consistency during. 

    Many places like Ohio State will have consultants or advisers that are specialists guys to help coach through but no... the coordinator is going to have everything to do with typically everyone else but those specialists unless it is in regard to what they want them to specifically execute."

    • Upvote 4
  2. 3 minutes ago, Hardcore Hawk said:

    I think I heard or read somewhere that portal players need to be registered to attend in the fall by May 1st to be eligible. Not sure if that is true or not, but it would make the timeline of departure make sense. 

    That is true, thus the timing for Hergel. The registration is set up with FBS in mind, not FCS schools that are playing in the spring. The NCAAs should have made an exception for FCS teams. It is yet another stupid NCAA rule.

    • Upvote 1
  3. 6 minutes ago, Sioux>Bison said:

    I don’t think anyone questioned Hergels talent. He could play for an FBS team but the question is why he would want to leave now? Does he think that would give him a better shot  at making the NFL? NDSU has shown you don’t need to play FBS to be a high draft pick. Going FBS is not a guarantee deal....

    There are other reasons that he would leave that have nothing to do with what you mentioned. (Edit: not $, don't go there!)

     

    BTW, I am in no way saying that I agree/disagree with his decision.

  4. 12 minutes ago, geaux_sioux said:

    I don’t know anything about OL so I’ll give my opinion. I watched him on a few of our first plays and he seemed quick and was able to lock onto a guy and move his feet well enough to keep really good leverage. Didn’t see him leaning and reaching too much. I’m sure some former, or still, big ugly, on this board can give a better analysis.

    Tried to focus on him during replays on the big screen (I was at the game). The hardest thing to learn for a young lineman is knowing when to disengage from a double team and engage on a blitzer or a stunt. Many high schools don't teach that, so it can be a learning curve when reaching college football. I saw him successfully disengage multiple times; his brain and his feet were quick enough to do it successfully. I didn't watch him on every play, but from what I saw he looked like a veteran. Much to like about this young man.

    Side bar - don't shoot the messenger - according to Hergel's twitter feed he got an offer from Washington State. That's damned impressive.

  5. 4 minutes ago, Ozzie82 said:

    - I love the "next man up, we got this" positivity from Holm and Tobin in Tom Miller's article, but Hergel's loss is a big deal. No other way around it. Offensive lines are about teamwork more than any other position group on the field and losing him now throws everything off.

     

    - We can argue about who is the best lineman on the team, but the fact that it's close shows how good this unit has been, and how substantial losing Hergel is.

     

    - Teeder, I love your optimism on Lavelle. I hope you're right about his upside. But there is no way that he or Kilty or anyone would have beaten out Hergel, no matter his upside, anytime over the next two years. Hergel is a hell of a player. Lavelle or Kilty would have slid into Tobin's spot next season after he graduated.

     

    - During a couple of games I kept wanting the Hawks to put in the second team OL earlier in the fourth quarter to get them more reps. I wish they had.

    Edit to say that I still believe that UND can and will win this Saturday. And it helps a ton that there are 4 veterans surrounding the new guy.

  6. - I love the "next man up, we got this" positivity from Holm and Tobin in Tom Miller's article, but Hergel's loss is a big deal. No other way around it. Offensive lines are about teamwork more than any other position group on the field and losing him now throws everything off.

     

    - We can argue about who is the best lineman on the team, but the fact that it's close shows how good this unit has been, and how substantial losing Hergel is.

     

    - Teeder, I love your optimism on Lavelle. I hope you're right about his upside. But there is no way that he or Kilty or anyone would have beaten out Hergel, no matter his upside, anytime over the next two years. Hergel is a hell of a player. Lavelle or Kilty would have slid into Tobin's spot next season after he graduated.

     

    - During a couple of games I kept wanting the Hawks to put in the second team OL earlier in the fourth quarter to get them more reps. I wish they had.

  7. 1 hour ago, Oxbow6 said:

    This is assuming UND doesn't continue to crap the bed on attendance because of COVID concerns and we can actually use our season tickets/seats.  Based on students pre-registering for next fall's classes in person/face to face I'm not holding out hope on athletic attendance.

    Every one of your posts is an explosion of positivity, a ray of sunshine in a rainstorm. You must be a riot at parties!

  8. 15 minutes ago, iramurphy said:

    Then I guess we disagree about what’s important. Let em yap. No coach should make decisions based on an opponents big mouth. Bubba needs to prepare an entire team for continued success. They just got their butts kicked. Schuster had a great game which should give him confidence. Vaughn also needs reps and dare I say needs the reps as much if not more than Schuster. Everything this team does should be with a focus on winning each game, and ultimately making the playoffs and winning championships. If you start worrying about an opponents trash talking you have lost focus on what’s important. 

    iramurphy, I'm with you. The main reason that the OL is so good this year is that they are experienced. Blowout games like the one on Saturday are a blessing because it gives the young players some experience and reps. In fact, I was hoping they'd put in the 2nd team OL when they got the ball back at the 8:00 mark (and up by 4 scores) in the fourth quarter because they need the reps. Same holds true for other positions. I wanted to see Vaughn in there more often at the end (although I understand the need to get more snaps for Schuster).

    • Upvote 1
  9. 1 hour ago, 90siouxfan said:

    I am curious about your coaching pedigree, cause you sound like a 7th grader telling the school bus how he would have won the super bowl.

    Well said.

     

    Most of his posts sound like that. He knows the least amount about football of any poster on this site. He's really good at being opinionated, though.

  10. 48 minutes ago, nodak651 said:

    Sounds kind of like how a hockey coach wouldn't normally work with the goalies. 

    Yeah, that's an excellent comparison. With kickers and goalies the skill set is so different from the rest of the team.

     

    (Side bar - I think kicking in football is weird. It's bizarre how it became such a crucial part of the game and why it stayed.)

  11. On 1/27/2021 at 7:19 PM, SIOUXFAN97 said:

    other than placekicking and punting???? not much left after those two very important pieces of the special teams puzzle.

    At the risk of sounding like I'm related to Kostich (I'm not), I did some further research on his responsibilities as special teams coordinator. Since the other big complaint about the special teams was that the kicking game has left a lot to be desired in recent years, I wanted to find out exactly what special teams coaches do. Are college special teams coaches supposed to be experts on kicking and punting techniques, especially since it seems that special teams appears to be a gateway job when moving up levels (D2 head coach becomes a ST coordinator at a Power 5 school)?

     

    I reached out to an acquaintance of mine, who has coached in the MAC, FCS, and D2, and is currently the head coach at at D3 school in Ohio. I asked him if special teams coaches are supposed to be well versed in kicking and punting techniques; his reply: "No. (the position) has much more to do with the mechanics and execution of the units outside of the specialists themselves. 

    Specialists today are birds of a feather who train and work in their own circles and really work on perfecting there craft in the offseason and really work to maintain consistency during. 

    Many places like Ohio State will have consultants or advisers that are specialists guys to help coach through but no... the coordinator is going to have everything to do with typically everyone else but those specialists unless it is in regard to what they want them to specifically execute."

     

    This makes sense to me. I think the kicking issues are more of a recruiting issue. I don't know if Kostich is primarily responsible for recruiting kickers and punters (it would make sense if he was and would be open to praise or blame if so), but it seems that if a kicker is struggling is has less to do with coaching and more to do with the player.

  12. 20 hours ago, UNDBIZ said:

    We get a few of our punts blocked per year.

    CM Sioux said: Hasn't the other aspects of special teams been pretty good as far a blocking kicks and covering kicks - yes it's a total picture but certainly has improved over the last few years.  

     

    I thought UNDBIZ's comment of a "few" blocks per year didn't sound right (a "few" to me means 3 or more), so I dug into the stats. Only 2017-2019 stats were available on the UND website, and they did not indicate which type of kick is blocked (punt, place kick). Summary: CM Sioux is correct, UNDBIZ is incorrect. According to the stats, (some) other aspects of special teams have clearly improved in the last few years. Here is the data:

     

    2017

    Opponents: 2 kicks blocked (Montana St., Sac St.)

    UND: 2 kicks blocked (vs. Montana, vs. E. Washington)

    Even

     

    2018

    Opponents: 2 kicks blocked (SHSU, Idaho)

    UND: 4 kicks blocked (SHSU, Idaho St., Sac St., Weber St.)

    +2 UND

     

    2019

    Opponents: 0 kicks blocked

    UND: 3 kicks blocked (Montana St., No. Colorado, So. Utah)

    +3 UND

  13. On 12/20/2020 at 11:13 PM, JohnboyND7 said:

     

    I think they did the right thing, i think if they were going to leave ND out they should have went with Cincinatti. If you put ND and A&M's resume next to each other, one is a step above the other's.

    ND made a few mistakes early in the game and let it get away from them. Seems to be a trend in these high-profile games, ND and Alabama both got run out of the building by Clemson a couple years ago. Clemson got dominated by LSU last year. OU got murdered on live TV by Joe Burrow. 

    ND's offensive line is banged up. Lost their star center in the BC game, his backup was hurt too and the guy who stepped in wasn't healthy either. And another lineman just got back from an appendectomy. 

    Assuming those guys (starting center still out) are closer to 100%, I think they'll be fine. They aren't as good as Clemson or Alabama but they are still very good. 

    Notre Dame doesn't have the skill players those teams have, so they are going to have trouble keeping up if their line is not humming along. They don't get many quick strikes like AL/Clemson do. 

    I have a feeling Alabama and Clemson will both win comfortably. Ohio State could hang around since they have no wear or tear on them this year. It should help ND a lot that the Bama qb does not run the ball but damn...them receivers and that big RB lol.

    If I'm posting that night, please forgive the spelling errors and confusing syntax as the game goes on...my brain is going to have a lot of alcohol self-prescribed.

    Two things were abundantly clear last night.

     

    1. Notre Dame is one of CFB’s top teams, but is not elite. 
     

    2. Ohio State is elite. And absolutely belonged in the playoffs. 

    • Upvote 3
  14. What a shame that Cinci didn’t get in. The 4 team playoff has really changed FBS football for the worse. They must expand to at least 8 teams so that deserving teams like Cincinnati and Coastal Carolina have an opportunity to go to the playoffs. Plus expanding will even out recruiting... right now most high level recruits are going to Alabama, Ohio State, Clemson, and Georgia because they have the best chance at the playoffs. 

    • Upvote 1
  15. On 11/29/2020 at 5:52 PM, SiouxFan100 said:

    I want to visit the notre dame campus someday real sweet to get to a notre dame game. Anybody here been to a notre dame home game?

    It’s fantastic. I tried to do the whole experience - went to the band practice the night before, pep rally, the game day trumpets in the admin building, and the game itself. It’s pretty fantastic. I took my dad, who grew up an ND fan thanks to being Irish Catholic, and had never been there before. My only regret is that I don’t have a picture of us together at the stadium  (he has since passed away). 
     

    Highly recommended. 

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 3
  16. On 11/29/2020 at 1:19 PM, JohnboyND7 said:

    Idk how the committee puts in a team playing half as many games as the others, and without a single big win. If they put OSU in, I think they will basically be telling everyone that your record doesn't really matter as long as we think you look like a good football team.

    You just described the exact method that the committee has always used to choose the top 4 teams - the eye test. They have no guidelines to follow... they don’t have to choose conference champions, they are not bound by any statistical guidelines. Their only job is to pick - in their view - the best 4 teams at the end of the season. 
     

    (I’m not necessarily advocating for OSU.)

×
×
  • Create New...