RuBNcereal
-
Posts
9 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by RuBNcereal
-
-
Simpson
-
This post disposes of the issue. The rule doesn't say to use your common sense...it says you must clearly see it cross the line to be a goal on replay...in addition, they are to use the overhead camera only...on that view, you cannot meet the standard...I think it's the puck but I cannot be sure...therefore ....no goal.
But if you paid attention to the camera the refs had they clearly had more than the overhead
-
Why can't we clearly see the puck on the replay? Because it is under the goalie's skate, right? Although we don't clearly see the puck, we do clearly see the goalie's skate well across the goal line. Use your common sense, you should be able to conclude that the puck under his skate was across the line while his skate was across the line. I know the replay wasn't 100% conclusive but I guess it's a case of the letter of the law vs. the spirit of the law. I had no rooting interest in that game, but I tried to imagine my favorite team being in the position of both teams. If the Sioux are in UNO's position and it is ruled a goal I'm disappointed, but if the Sioux are in Michigan's position and it is ruled not a goal I'm livid.
Then whats the point of replaying it? Judgement calls?
-
Still wondering about the camera deal though. You could clearly see they were lookin at a front angle and an over head angle? Thought the over head was the only available???
-
They've apparently changed the standard from "clearly crossed the goal line" to "coulda maybe sorta probably crossed the goal line if I had to guess, considering it's OT and I have dinner reservations".
Thats hilarious! No, luapsided. They goal was initially waved off and needed clear evidence to turn over
-
When the F*** did the refs have the ability to look at multiple camera angles?! ... busted bracket ....
-
1
-
1
-
-
gregoire
-
Knight....if Im not too late
CONTEST TIME - guess the scoring line combo
in Men's Hockey
Posted
Parks from rowney and forbort