Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

tboneund

Members
  • Posts

    229
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by tboneund

  1. GO DOGS!

    I have to say that while I am still a die-hard Sioux fan the Dogs have played their way into my heart this year. Now that the Sioux are out I am really hoping that the Dogs can go all the way!

    Destroy those dirty Gophers!

  2. I heard this quote last year after the MN Wild beat the Colorado Avs in the NHL playoffs and I think it is fitting here. "The better team lost, but the team that deserved it won."

    I'm not saying the Sioux did not deserve to win, but obviously it wasn't our night. Hopefully we'll have nough guys staying and some good freshman coming in. I look forward to seeing the Sioux go all the way next year.

    Tough luck for Jordan Parise tonight, I have made it clear on more than one occasion that I prefer Brandt, but I can't blame JPar this time. JPar played really well and Denver got one in, tough break for our seniors.

  3. First, yes the goals scored were on the ice, not up high. Second, Brandt went down earlier than usual against MN earlier this year and that worked out well. Stick with Brandt, he got us the points to be WCHA champs and floundered behind sloppy defense to lose the Broadmoor, he will not flounder again. Give him the chance to take us all the way. I would like to see him go the distance, starting on Friday so he can maybe get into a rhythm, but seeing JPar to keep him fresh wouldn't surprise me either.

    I would agree that no matter who starts, if we lose, that goalie will get blamed, but that is one of the downsides to being the goalie.

  4. First of all, Vanek is a big guy, bigger than prpich. There will always be slashing and high sticking in hockey. All I hear is whining when I read through these things. The Sioux lost, so what. And yes, Ballard and Vanek are really talented players, just because we have a defensemen better than all of yours doesn't give you the right to rip into him. Vanek is highly skilled, I don't know about you, but you don't get drafted number 5 overall in the NHL if you are a "no talent hack"

    Vanek is a cherry picker...not talented.

    The comment about having "...a defensemen [sic] better than all of yours..." is quite frankly laughable.

    True he was drafted number 5 overall, maybe he has talent, but that doesn't mean he's not a cherry-picking hack.

×
×
  • Create New...