Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

schmidtdoggydog

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,364

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by schmidtdoggydog

    UND Recruits - 2007-08 Updates

    in Men's Hockey

    Posted

    Here is what I could find courtesy of tsn.ca and the shattuck site regarding stats of some players of interest while at shattuck (year, games, goals, assists and points).

    Parise 7/28/84:

    '02, 63, 73 101, 174 ---------- '01, 68, 82 77, 159

    Crosby 8/7/87:

    '03, 57, 72 90, 162

    Murray 8/17/84:

    '02, 65, 58 84, 142

    Stafford 10/30/85:

    '03, 60, 47 69, 116

    J. Toews 4/29/88:

    '05, 64, 48 62, 110

    Okposo 4/16/88:

    05', 65, 47 45, 92

    D. Toews 6/7/90:

    '08, 50, 44 56, 100 (season in progress) ------ '07, 61, 34 47, 81

    Sorry, I couldn't find any Duncan stats from his time at Shattuck.

    Gopher FB player charged with sexual conduct

    in Football

    Posted

    This isn't Duke and you know damn well that the school has seen the video. He will get his day in court and a well deserved 25 years of prison rape. But for now, get him as far away from the U of M as possible.

    If charged with CrimSex 3 subdivisions c,d,g,h,i,j,k,l,m or n and proven guilty and with no criminal history score (no prior felonies, etc.) he would likely receive a 48-month prison sentence, unless there is a basis to depart from the sentencing guidelines, of which he would only serve 2/3 or 32 months with good behavior (the majority of inmates in MN satisfy the good behavior requirement, believe it or not).

    If charged with CrimSex 3 subdivisions a,b,e or f, and proven guilty and with no criminal history score he would not even be sent to prison, but could serve one-year in the county jail.

    In both cases he would have to register as sex offender and comply with those, along with other, sentencing requirements, but 25 years under the Minnesota sentencing guidelines is an impossibility.

    That being said, the prosecutors based the alleged victim's helplessness in part on her estimated BAC. That is likely where they will run into some problems as proving that will be quite difficult. It is easy to look at a person and say they appear intoxicated, but it becomes little more difficult to pinpoint someone's BAC based on observation alone. I represented a 110 pound, 21-year old female several weeks ago charged with DWI and her test result was a .33 and her booking photo could have been used as a high school yearbook photo, she looked that put together at a .33. The point is, appearance means very little a lot of the time.

×
×
  • Create New...