Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

The Fan

Members
  • Posts

    23
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by The Fan

  1. On 10/6/2019 at 9:14 AM, forksandspoons said:

    Wasn’t Wanzek like a national champ in the punt pass and kick? He’s gotta be able to punt the ball more than 30 yards


    When Noah Wanzek was a 15-year-old, he placed second in the nation in the NFL’s punt pass and kick. He also was an all conference/ all state punter In high school.  He averaged in the 40s. In one game against Minot High, he hit a 72 yard booming punt.  Just saying.

  2. 10 hours ago, Longtime fan said:

    Overall talent is not where it should be for an fcs team. They’re recruiting D2 for a D1 program with an occasional stud.  Just looking through the roster I see, imo,  9 guys that would have potential to crack into another teams two deep chart thats a top 10 team.  

    McKinney, fort, jaxon, Caleb, Donnell, Bennett, maag, Siegel and Isaac Moore (as a OLB/ ILB)  would be the 9.   Donnell, Bennett, Siegel and fort could start with most any team.  

    2 from the offense and 7 from D .  

    recruiting needs a major kick in the ass!  

    As well as coaching needs new coaches 

     

     

     

     

     

    Don’t necessarily disagree but I think you missed some; Larson, Wanzek, Canady, JJ,  Toivonen to name a few.  They have all put up respectable numbers playing in the same league as the top 10 teams do. 

  3. 18 minutes ago, Teeder11 said:

    You must be new here. ( ;  

    No. 1 rule of Sioux Sports: the injury “excuse” can only be applied when it pertains to our opponents*, when we beat them. ACCEPTED USAGE ADDENDUM: It can be used by our own fan base, the vanqished teams’ representatives, stakeholders and fan bases and/or trolling instigators from third party rival fan bases. 

    * Mainly pertains to FB and BB program opponents. 

     

    Just thought you should know. 

    Signed,

    MGMT wannabe

    Yes, I am new enough to not know that I broke the rules!  My two oldest children are Sioux graduates.  I should’ve asked them first   Sorry. 

    • Upvote 1
  4. 1 hour ago, UND-FB-FAN said:

    These numbers are skewed if one is trying to evaluate talent. UND threw the ball way more than they do now when Golladay was on the team (2012-2103), as evidenced by throws & catches. Hardin was on the team getting catches also. Additionally, UND had no running game with those Muss teams and threw short passes to make up for no running game. 

    If Golladay had stayed for his junior and senior season ... well, WATCH OUT! 

    Point is Golladay was and is way more talented than Wanzek. Wanzek is a good player for UND but to say he is even with Golladay, who is currently starting in the NFL, is just absurd.

    As I said, UND needs more guys like Golladay and Hardin on their team. After Wanzek and Maag, UND’s receivers are not talented enough. In their defense, though, they are not often put in good situations by Rudolph. 

    Golladay 2 years 

    UND had 507 completions amongst 14 different receivers
    Golladay 99/507=19.53%  of completions
    Wanzek 2 years
    UND had 348 completions amongst 14 different receivers
    Wanzek 77/348=22.13%  of completions 
    I’m just stating facts 
    Someone mentioned our receivers are horrible. If you throw 207  more times, like Golladay years,  there stats’s would be right up there.   And our # 2,3 & 4 receivers are out yesterday. That has an impact on the game. I’m not implying anything more than that. And I’m not the one who brought Golladay comparison up.  Others did. I’m Just stating facts. 
  5. 2 hours ago, Hawkster said:

    It's frustrating that Muss could get guys like Golladay but then we couldn't keep them, and now it seems we can't even get the really elite players any more.   .

    If Golladay is the measuring stick for productive WR’s FYI

    Kenny Golladay’s first 2 years
    UND threw 827 times
    Golladay-99 catches or 11.9 % of UND total
    Golladay - 9 TD or 1.09% per UND throw
    Golladay -1313 yds or 1.59 yds per UND throw
    Wanzek first 2 years
    UND threw 620 times
    Wanzek- 77 catches or 12.42% of UND total
    Wanzek- 8 TD or 1.29% per UND throw
    Wanzek- 1015 yds or 1.64 yds per UND throw

  6. 7 hours ago, UNDBIZ said:

    Ketteringham seems to struggle with the corner fade route.  The throw to Wanzek in the SHSU game was also pretty bad, just got lucky.

    I agree. Odds are the catch would have been difficult as Noah was covered. But he had nearly 10 more yards to the back of the end zone to work with. To give him a chance you have to throw up a jump ball. Noah was a ND mr basketball candidate dunking the ball many times with a 38” vertical and 6’4” with long arms. One of his final high school basketball games against Dickinson he had 18 rebounds against 7’ Jordan Meidinger now with NDSU. They are not using his skills right. And he has proven he has good hands. He didn’t even have a chance at that ball. 

    • Upvote 1
  7. 1 hour ago, UND-FB-FAN said:

    That’s a difficult throw (across the field over a defender) with not great separation by Wanzek (certainly wasn’t wide open). The UND receivers are below average FCS players and were completely overtaken by the above average to very good FBS defensive backs of Washington. 

    Maybe so!  But Ketteringham is no Aaron Rodgers either. Anybody who has watched the last 2 years has witnessed Wanzek make a leaping grab or 2 in the back of the end zone with his vertical jump. That throw was short and low. Put some air under it. Throw it where only Wanzek can make a play or out of bounds. Why else do we have  6’4” basketball type WR’s? Listen, we win as a team and we lose as a team.  I just felt there has been an inordinate amount of blame for our passing woes on the WR in this thread.  I wish Ketteringham all the good fortune possible. He seems like a great kid and a good athlete. 

    • Upvote 2
  8. 37 minutes ago, Sioux>Bison said:

    Ketteringham will do just fine going into the rest of the season. You guys need to realize we were playing against NFL caliber secondaries so how do you expect our homegrown WR’s to get open? We have some talented WR but none that I think at this point could play on Sundays. Do you really expect our wr to be open every play so of course Ketteringham would be under pressure. We will have a better advantage when we start playing our FCS schedule. No worries from this camp. Can’t wait until Saturday!

     

    B203D8E7-2417-4950-9BF4-4772E2CAE819.thumb.jpeg.92e3e60cb48e18d3de0f8133888c082c.jpegOK, I know I’m biased, but I’m getting a little tired of all the blame on WR’s. Here’s an example of our wide receiver open in the Seattle Times. If the quarterback would’ve put some air under the ball or thrown it a split-second sooner we would’ve had a TD. The score would’ve been 17 to 7 late in the third. 

  9. 6 hours ago, Old School Guy said:

    I would like to see Zimmerman get some snaps if the passing game is stagnant next week.

    I agree. Ketteringham seems to have all the physical skills, but the verdict is out on his leadership abilities. Last year, when Zimmerman came into the Montana game, you could feel the change.  It seems like Zimmerman has the “it” factor.  I would continue with Ketteringham but if the offense doesn’t start clicking, I would consider Zimmerman.  Can’t place all the blame on wr’s.  In 1st game, Ketteringham  held the ball for less than 3 seconds when  he let it fly,  catching Wanzek 45 yards downfield from line of scrimmage. Doesn’t seem like a slow wr to me. He has made a number of catches the last two years on fade routes or back shoulder throws. If you want him to make a play you got to throw him the ball.  You have to give these big guys a chance to make a play on those 50-50 balls!  Throw them open!

    And yes I did play high school and college football!  :) 
     
     
    Sent from my iPhone
    • Upvote 1
  10. 2 hours ago, geaux_sioux said:

    We've got too many slow WRs still. Separation is key. It does us no good to go three wide with guys who can't separate against a decent CB.

    Wanzek was open numerous times. Studsrud didn't look his way. He's the kind a receiver you throw it up and let him make a play. Last week Oliveira carries 16 times for 164 yards & Wanzek targeted 10 or 11 times, caught 7 for 117 yards two touchdowns. This week Oliveira carries only four times and Wanzek targeted only three times and caught the two that he should have today. 

    • Upvote 4
×
×
  • Create New...