ThompHockey
-
Posts
49 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by ThompHockey
-
-
2 hours ago, Oxbow6 said:
Of those 9 forwards watch out for Weatherby........IMO he'll make the biggest jump from this past season to next.
My moneys on Caufield
-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, bcblues said:
These announcers don't seem to be terrible homers. Good for them.
Was thinking the same. Finally
-
29 minutes ago, Walsh Hall said:
The slash was not on the blade, but it did end there as the blade is typically at the bottom end of a stick.
Looking at this pic he hit his stick but that kinda slash happens throughout the game. Its never gonna get called in that situation. Unless you lose your stick or have the puck when you get slashed
Really looks like he went down to his knee for that one timer right!?
And hes not going right at the goalie he would have missed him by 2 feet.... lol
-
13 minutes ago, Cratter said:
1) Kawa stick in the air about to come down.
2) The slash complete. Western player still on his feet.
3) Kawa still has him pinned down. Knee finally about to touch.
4) Western player losing his balance from Kawa pushing and holding him down.
5) Kawa on the western players back right before he slides into the goalie.
Green colored glasses dont see the slash? Clearly interference by Kawaguchi.
His stick comes down on the western players blade not his stick... thats never considered a slash. There would be 40 slashing penalties a game if they called that.
And this makes it look like the western player is skating right at the goalie and initiates the contact with guch. Again easy call but keep trying
-
1
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Walsh Hall said:
The WMU player was dropping to a knee to get low anticipating a pass to one-time at the net. He was moving in a straight line prior to getting hit. The green tinted glasses are in full effect on this one.
The puck was behind him.... he was not getting ready for a one timer lol
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, tnt said:
I slow motioned it and his knee was coming down before Kawaguchi made contact.
This guy just really doesnt want to be wrong. The WMU player was planning on contact and was ready for it
-
Just now, Cratter said:
Definately a two handed slash to Western.
A stick slash now makes a player go to his knees? Lol you want to see what ever way makes you right but thats an easy no goal call.
-
2
-
-
4 minutes ago, Godsmack said:
I asked our Air Force cadet whom we sponsor, who plays for the AF club team and has no dog in the fight whatsoever, his opinion on it and here’s what he said...
”The western guy goes down to one knee before getting to the net, so I’d say he made no attempt to avoid the goalie.”
The player was looking for contact, he knew he was gonna slide into the goalie as soon as he got it.
-
1 minute ago, stoneySIOUX said:
Honestly, I think Friday night's was horrendous and I still have no idea how that's not a goal. Last night's was a bit closer, but still should not have been a goal. Player was already going to be going directly into Scheel without Guchi touching him. There's no way he was avoiding contact.
Exactly
-
No the refs didn't say to each other "hey we took one away last night might as well take one away tonight". Lol
And anyone who knows the actual rules.. like in the rule book knows that was the right call.
-
8 minutes ago, Cratter said:
Both nights "no goals" were crap calls.
That should be universally understood.
Cant help you otherwise.
But at least the refs called it consistently
Saturday nights was the right call. Ya can't skate into a goalie.... even if your pushed a little, you put yourself in that position to run into the goalie. Easy call
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
28 minutes ago, Walsh Hall said:Draw a line on the movement of the WMU player at 30 seconds in that video from the circle to contact with the goalie. He’s moving in a straight line which would be outside the crease. He’s checked by Gooch and his momentum changed by almost 90 degrees.
I’m not complaining, but it’s concerning that the season could end on one of these BS calls which seem to happen frequently. Thankfully the Friday call didn’t end up mattering. The Saturday call may keep western out of the playoffs.
Thats not what i see. I see a player who skated to the front of the net barely gets pushed and changes his momentum to run into the goalie. He was looking for contact to do exactly what he did.... easy call
-
7
-
Just now, cberkas said:
All 4 players watching the puck at the goal line.
Why were they all on the goal line????
-
Keane just passed it to the Duluth D on that goal.... our D screws up soo much is crazy
-
It's tough watching a game where every shot makes you cringe because there's a good chance it goes in.
-
1
-
-
Scheel has not been good since the break but Thome is not the anwser, we have seen what hes like as a starter and its not good. Scheel needs to figure it out or this year is going to go downhill fast.
-
Thats a 5 and a game
-
1
-
-
Scheel should have had that but the D changing up before they entered the zone is a huge mistake...
-
Its funny that its been 1/2 a year and all the Barry fans are on their knees.. hes had a good start to this year and it looks like the reason is the coaching staff with only 4 new guys really seeing ice time. Hes made good choices on his staff plus hes changed up alot of the offensive schemes they've used the last two years.
Im glad hes been able to turn it around and start making decisions that are working to bring ths team back to the top but he should have made them earlier.
I hope this first half wasnt a fluke(it really doesn't look like one)but with Berrys track record you never know. If he can keep this team working together, we could have another natty. It will be interesting to see what happens but for now remember ITS 1/2 A SEASON!!!!!!
-
4
-
-
6 minutes ago, SiouxFanatic said:
Jeez, did Simonson steal your wife/girlfriend or something?
Got a little too into simmonson bashing but he cost us a really good player and now im worried we are seeing the same with Judd. At least Caufield is a local kid, maybe is family can donate enough too get him a starting spot like simmonsons did(last one i couldnt help myself)
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, tnt said:
Simonson plus 10 his first two years, while Wilkie was minus 6, despite playing more on offensive lines. Who is making stuff
+/- doesnt mean anything for simmonson. Every plus he got was because he was lucky enough too be on the ice when his teammates were scoring. 6 goals in 4 years of starting on a college hockey team........
-
4 minutes ago, burd said:
So, you're 90 and have had season tickets all your life?
Hahaha ya cause its hard too look back on the history of a program nowadays....
-
1 hour ago, tnt said:
Simonson had more points his first two years than Wilkie did, and was more responsible defensively with a much better plus/minus. So I assume you weren’t one of the fans that was hard on Wilkie because of his lack of scoring?
? Simmonson was absolutely terrible on defense. He played 4 years at und and had 6 goals.... he will go down as one of the worst players to ever pass though the program
Wilkie played half his freshman season and had 5 goals. He had size and actually played defense so i have no idea why your trying to make !@#$ up
-
Barry lost Wilkie because he played Simmonson over him. Now we have Judd losing time to johnson!?!?!? How is barry this blind to talent or is it just playing favorites?
Post pod series #5-Denver......for the 5th....and 6th time.......
in Men's Hockey
Posted
Thome is a ok goalie at best. The smartest thing denver did was hurt scheel at the end of yesterdays game...