supersioux Posted March 8, 2006 Author Share Posted March 8, 2006 Hockey Mom, I'm with you. At least have the decency to tell people what it was for. If it was that bad people would probably understand why she was cut. I have to believe that there was a reason but the question is weather it was bad enough to send her packing. If it was Parise, SOMEBODY WOULD HAVE TO ANSWER the question. I guess that women's hockey can get away with it and not have to answer the question. The other thing that seems odd to me was the 3rd Goalie played against Wisc. If she hadn't played all year it wouldn't make sense to burn a year of eligibility for one period. That seems very questionable, unless I'm misinformed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southpaw Posted March 8, 2006 Share Posted March 8, 2006 Hockey Mom, I'm with you. At least have the decency to tell people what it was for. If it was that bad people would probably understand why she was cut. I have to believe that there was a reason but the question is weather it was bad enough to send her packing. If it was Parise, SOMEBODY WOULD HAVE TO ANSWER the question. I guess that women's hockey can get away with it and not have to answer the question. The other thing that seems odd to me was the 3rd Goalie played against Wisc. If she hadn't played all year it wouldn't make sense to burn a year of eligibility for one period. That seems very questionable, unless I'm misinformed. To redshirt a year, you have to have notified the NCAA early in the season. I'm assuming that she hadn't, and thus whether she played or not didn't matter towards losing a year of eligibility... she had already lost it. Also, just ask gopher men's hockey fans what they think about penalties being made public. With all of the bar/underage/booster stuff going on, it seems like fans should never be allowed to know why a player was suspended/cut. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HockeyMom Posted March 8, 2006 Share Posted March 8, 2006 Also, just ask gopher men's hockey fans what they think about penalties being made public. With all of the bar/underage/booster stuff going on, it seems like fans should never be allowed to know why a player was suspended/cut. I didn't say if it was right or wrong, what I am saying is that if a men's player was not sitting on the bench, or cut from the team, we would all know why. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whockeyfan Posted March 8, 2006 Share Posted March 8, 2006 You think the girls will be tired from the drive...oh well that's okay, we don't expect to win anyway! End of rant! I hope no one really thought that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HockeyMom Posted March 8, 2006 Share Posted March 8, 2006 http://www.uscho.com/news/id,12249/NCAASki...sAnnounced.html Nice way to finish out your college hockey career, and good luck! That's a big honor for Devon. The highlight of the season for the avatar was Devon signing a pic to her......she is so proud of it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockeyfan4life Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 Maggie got cut for coming to practice intoxicated, and then an accumulation of things that she has done over the years. Sad thing is, Johnson showed up drunk too. One got cut, the other got two games. Consistancy? I think not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND92,96 Posted March 20, 2006 Share Posted March 20, 2006 This was in the minutes from a recent iac meeting: Women Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HockeyMom Posted March 20, 2006 Share Posted March 20, 2006 Thanks for the info 92,96. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockeyfan4life Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 Cara Wooster quit. Sarah Connelly quit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HockeyMom Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 Cara Wooster quit. Sarah Connelly quit. NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PIM Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 In regards to the minutes from the meeting, obviously the real problem has been lost in translation whether that's on purpose or not who knows... the problem is not "the seniors being upset about not getting enough ice time" and I think that's highlighted by the two girls who have just quit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teamsioux Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 It's a good thing UND has wasted hundreds of thousands of dollars on this program to be possibly worse off than it was 3-4 years ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HockeyMom Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 I wouldn't say that UND has wasted the money. Developing a program takes time.........but I think it's time to move on and try something new, because obviously what's taking place now isn't working. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teamsioux Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 That's what I mean, are we any farther along than 3 years ago.....I would say not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HockeyMom Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 That's what I mean, are we any farther along than 3 years ago.....I would say not. We are a little farther along than we were 3 years ago....we have three seasons under our belt and two seasons as part of the WCHA. But that's the only thing.....apart from the win over Duluth this year. I took your response to mean that all of the money spent on the program was a waste.......I disagree with that. I'm really upset about losing a Wooster. The avatar has a stuffed dog named Wooster..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teamsioux Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 How about the other Wooster? Odds would favor both leaving, wouldn't it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HockeyMom Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 How about the other Wooster? Odds would favor both leaving, wouldn't it? I hope not, I hope this all gets worked out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockeyfan4life Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 Alexia Gagnon Laplante quit as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
choyt3 Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 Alexia Gagnon Laplante quit as well. Can Buning stop the bleeding? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dagies Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 I don't know if the program can be patient enough for someone to be given two or three more years when you look at this: 2002-3- 10wins 2003-4- 16wins 2004-5- 9wins 2005-6- 7wins Maybe it's time to pack up and move on. The women's program is at the very bottom of the barrel. With a roster that on paper would impress any team they had to play, they are definately not performing. Do I blame the girls? Some might, however I don't. The head coach is not qualified, and she does not know what she is doing. The assistant coaches however do. If you speak to Froats or Colontino for 30 seconds you know they have their heads on straight, and know what hockey is all about. If you talk to Rivard, it sounds like she's got a great plan, but has no way to execute it. If anything she's executing players....more players have quit or been cut than have graduated...does this not say anything for the program? Sadly, the "team" that could be made from the players cut/quit would rival the current team right now. How long do we have to go before the head coach is fired? If the players don't respect her, which they don't if you ask ANY of their parents, then how can we as fans respect her? Even when you ask the players if they like it, or if they are having fun, they usually look at one another, as if they are sharing some joke or not sure if their TRUE response will get back to the coach, and say "uh..oh...yeah...um, it's great!" with a fake smile plastered on their face. How are we going to have a good team when the players themselves are telling recruits not to come? How are we going to have a good team when the MEN'S players are telling their little sisters not to come? Say goodbye to the dream of the Lamoureux sisters, they've moved on to greener pastures. If you ask me the women's hockey program is a joke right now. No, I don't think women playing hockey is a joke, but I think something needs to be done with this program for it to contend with the best teams, and it definately has the potential...just get rid of the coach. Some reading this will probably think I'm making outlandish comments that have no base, however, I HAVE talked to the girls in their truest form, and DO know their opinions. These girls aren't bitching and complaining, as they have been accused of doing in the past, they have legitimate complaints...did anyone know that Rivard made them run the 5K in the 2003-2004 season outside...until December...in knee deep snow? That sounds productive, it wasn't until the Track coach stepped in and said that they were packing down the snow that they were allowed to stop. Did anyone else know that the men's team watch their practices and call it "the circus", they think it's a joke, and they say the practice has no structure, and is more entertainment than anything else because it is so ridiculous looking. I'm sorry to rant, but as a parent of a child who looks up to these girls, I am at my wits end with this program. I don't care if they lose every game, I care that they are able to play to their optimum potential...and for the past 3 years, they haven't been, and I don't blame the girls. It'll be interesting to see who quits this year, and what survivors are left to keep the team alive. I'm not up in GF to experience this myself, though on our last trip for a men's game my buddies and I went and cheered on the women's team. It was a good time. As a Sioux hockey fan, I want to see the men's and women's team succeed. I have a friend who is fairly close to the women's program and a month ago he was expressing his frustration with the direction things are going under Rivard. The above points are pretty much what he had to say as well. He also predicted several members will be quitting the team, and I see from recent posts that's the case. Many times in these situations it's just not "the coach" who is the problem, but probably other things. In this case, however, I'd say it doesn't look like the coach is getting the job done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HockeyMom Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 I was talking to a coach on the east coast today, and he's heard stuff out there about players packing it up...... This can't be good. But you know what, if they are leaving for reasons that they believe in, more power to them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siouxfan44 Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 I think the fact that the girls are dropping like flies should be saying something. Bunning obviously won't listen, or is choosing not too. So here it is for him loud and clear: the seniors on the team WERE NOT complaining about ice time number one. Number two the girls have been trying to fire their coach for the past 2 years, and no one has done anything about it except make remarks such as "they're complaining" or "it's the ones who aren't getting ice time" or "once there is the full 18 scholarships the problems will be solved". My question is how are you going to get to 18 scholarships when there won't be a team to give them to? For once it'd be nice for the administrators to LISTEN to what the girls are telling them, last time I checked a 2-23-2 record in the WCHA isn't just "bitching and complaining". Someone should email this forum to Bunning, so he can get in tune with what's going on in the athletic community. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCM Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 I don't have a clue as to what's going on with the women's hockey team, but I do know that the problems aren't going to be solved by airing dirty laundry on an Internet message board. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockeyfan4life Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 Kari Gabrielson was cut. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siouxfan44 Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 I don't think it's a matter of airing dirty laundry, but it's more of trying to bring awareness to the problems that are at hand. The reason why I'm so upset about this is that Bunning and others are making false problems, and saying everything can be solved by reaching maximum scholarship, but none of that is the problem at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.