Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum
dagies

Prospective Sioux Recruits

Recommended Posts

On GPL they said Casey Staum decommitted from Omaha.  Seems like he would be nice pick up for someone.  Last defenseman that we plucked from Omaha after decommitting worked out pretty well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

William Fallstrom decomitted from Minnesota

Ty Farmer decomitted from Michigan State

Garrett VanWhye decomitted from Army

Probably not being looked at by UND, but all three play in Fargo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The fascinating world of Wisconsin recruiting isn't showing any signs of slowing down. It's expected both Caufield brothers will pick Wisconsin after decommitting from Ohio State, if that holds true.

Current recruits:

  • 98' - D: 1 F: 4
  • 99' - D: 0 F: 5 G: 1
  • 00' - D: 6 F: 4
  • 01' - D: 0 F: 7
  • 02': D: 3 F: 2

33 total: 22 Forwards, 10 Defenseman 1 Goalie

The ascetics just look bad, I realize not every player that commits will end up on campus, UND has been and will be in that position (as is every other team). Still, I would love to hear Wisconsin's recruiting pitch to players right now. 

Other schools:

  • BU - 16
  • UND - 17
  • Minnesota - 17
  • Denver - 17
  • Notre Dame - 21
  • BC - 21
  • Harvard - 22
  • Michigan - 23

I believe Michigan has the second most at 23, that's 10 less players than Wisconsin. 

From a Rizzo recruiting angle, I hope this is good news for UND if Caufield commits to Wisco, I mean they have to have a limit at some point, you'd think. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, AJS said:

The fascinating world of Wisconsin recruiting isn't showing any signs of slowing down. It's expected both Caufield brothers will pick Wisconsin after decommitting from Ohio State, if that holds true.

Current recruits:

  • 98' - D: 1 F: 4
  • 99' - D: 0 F: 5 G: 1
  • 00' - D: 6 F: 4
  • 01' - D: 0 F: 7
  • 02': D: 3 F: 2

33 total: 22 Forwards, 10 Defenseman 1 Goalie

The ascetics just look bad, I realize not every player that commits will end up on campus, UND has been and will be in that position (as is every other team). Still, I would love to hear Wisconsin's recruiting pitch to players right now. 

Other schools:

  • BU - 16
  • UND - 17
  • Minnesota - 17
  • Denver - 17
  • Notre Dame - 21
  • BC - 21
  • Harvard - 22
  • Michigan - 23

I believe Michigan has the second most at 23, that's 10 less players than Wisconsin. 

From a Rizzo recruiting angle, I hope this is good news for UND if Caufield commits to Wisco, I mean they have to have a limit at some point, you'd think. 

The rumor is Caufield will be going to Wisconsin. Wisconsin will still recruit Rizzo and push one of their 100 commitments back a year or let one go. 

Edit: Wisconsin picked up Jack Gorniak.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, cberkas said:

The rumor is Caufield will be going to Wisconsin. Wisconsin will still recruit Rizzo and push one of their 100 commitments back a year or let one go. 

Edit: Wisconsin picked up Jack Gorniak.

They just got another kid today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, scpa0305 said:

They just got another kid today.

One poster on USCHO is saying Tony is just going to push players through Wisconsin making them a NHL factory. I think one of the Minnesota posters on there might be correct thinking Tony is just there for the short term.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, AJS said:

... that's 10 less players than Wisconsin. 

No, that's 10 fewer players than Wisconsin. 

If you can count it it's "fewer"; if not, it's less. 

I gave away a cup of coffee so I have one cup fewer; so now I have less coffee grounds available for brewing.
(I can count cups of coffee but not coffee grounds.) 

 

The preceding was brought to you as an attempt to save MafiaMan's grammar mind. :D 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said:

No, that's 10 fewer players than Wisconsin. 

If you can count it it's "fewer"; if not, it's less. 

I gave away a cup of coffee so I have one cup fewer; so now I have less coffee grounds available for brewing.
(I can count cups of coffee but not coffee grounds.) 

 

The preceding was brought to you as an attempt to save MafiaMan's grammar mind. :D 

I did not know that. And to think I thought I was good at grammar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×