Media Stories on the Sioux Name For reference / interest
#1451
Posted 29 November 2006 - 04:45 PM
#1452
Posted 29 November 2006 - 05:10 PM
#1453
Posted 29 November 2006 - 08:15 PM
Quote
If Indian nicknames are so insensitive, why do tribes such as the Spokane Indians give their blessing? Maybe DYB can answer that one.
#1454
Posted 29 November 2006 - 09:01 PM
undsportsfan, on Nov 29 2006, 03:15 PM, said:
Quote
FINALLY!!!!!!!! How many times have we said this!?! We are cheering for the athletes that are wearing the Fighting Sioux name and logo. A name that was chosen because the Sioux Indians of old are believed to have been courageous, fearless, honorable and a force to be dealth with. We are NOT honoring the Sioux of today. We are NOT cheering for living Native Americans who are Sioux. We are NOT disgracing the name of the Sioux of yesterday when we cheer our Fighting Sioux athletes on the victory. We did NOT choose the name Fighting Sioux because we hate Native Americans or because we disrespect the Sioux of times gone by!
And when our opponents yell, 'Sioux suck' they are NOT referring to Native Americans who are Sioux. They are referring to the athletes who are wearing the Fighting Sioux name and logo.
Finally, Doreen, you get it!!! We are NOT cheering for the 'Sioux, as a group...' Damn, woman, it took you long enough!!!
#1455
Posted 29 November 2006 - 11:45 PM
Who are the ones instigating the acrimony, hostility, etc.? You guessed it. It's the PC whiners. If people who are reasonable actually resist and fight back legally against PC oppression, they cause hostility? The same old hackneyed logic: If you disagree with me, you "hate" me. If you want to use the FS nickname, you disrespect people and cause "pain and suffering." I wish we could get Christ resurrect Rod Serling.
What these people forget, other than their sanity, is that UND has legal trademark rights to the nickname
#1456
Posted 30 November 2006 - 10:46 AM
#1457
Posted 30 November 2006 - 03:44 PM
siouxrunner, on Nov 30 2006, 09:46 AM, said:
.jpg)
there have been photos taken of students dressing like this on UND campus... and back in 1999-2000 i remember a big deal about some fraternity guys doing it.
#1458
Posted 30 November 2006 - 04:04 PM
undsportsfan, on Nov 30 2006, 02:44 PM, said:
Where are these photos? I've lived in Grand Forks since 1992 and have never seen anyone do anything like this, even in a photo.
#1459
Posted 30 November 2006 - 04:33 PM
undsportsfan, on Nov 30 2006, 02:44 PM, said:
You actually have seen dated photos of this or you were told about some photo with an approximate date?Please share them, that's all we have ever asked, to bring the proof.
#1460
Posted 30 November 2006 - 04:50 PM
undsportsfan, on Nov 30 2006, 02:44 PM, said:
I find it hard to believe that if there truely were pictures like this around, that someone would not have scanned them and posted somewhere to show the world how awful it is on campus at UND. BRIDGES comes to mind.
I went to UND in 1976. I never once saw anyone dress up as an Indian. I have been going to football and hockey games at UND for years and have NEVER seen anyone in feathers or warpaint or anything like that. I have only seen respect for the SIOUX , all Native Americans, and ALL races in general. I would think that if anyone were to show up at a game at UND like this, that they would be asked to leave.
#1461
Posted 30 November 2006 - 05:07 PM
undsportsfan, on Nov 30 2006, 03:44 PM, said:
And they are posted where? Why weren't the photo's provided to the NC$$ by the same Name Change group that gave them the decades old 'evidence? Mayhap they don't exist?
Same old stuff, "Someone told me; I know I read it somewhere; I know someone who saw it;" blah blah blah.
#1462
Posted 30 November 2006 - 05:18 PM
Sioux-cia, on Nov 30 2006, 04:07 PM, said:
undsportsfan, on Nov 30 2006, 03:44 PM, said:
And they are posted where? Why weren't the photo's provided to the NC$$ by the same Name Change group that gave them the decades old 'evidence? Mayhap they don't exist?
Same old stuff, "Someone told me; I know I read it somewhere; I know someone who saw it;" blah blah blah.
Which we all know is infinitely more credible than "This one guy in my class who heard it from his third cousin's best friend's brother who passed through UND on his way to Fargo about 20 years ago."
#1463
Posted 30 November 2006 - 09:02 PM
Air Force One, on Nov 30 2006, 03:33 PM, said:
undsportsfan, on Nov 30 2006, 02:44 PM, said:
You actually have seen dated photos of this or you were told about some photo with an approximate date?Please share them, that's all we have ever asked, to bring the proof.
I asked my son (a fraternity member) if he had ever heard of this happening. It was a couple of years before he joined a fraternity, but he hadn't ever heard of anything like this. I have my doubts, too. I think the "anchor run" is closer to the top of their "things to do" list, than dress like an indian.
#1464
Posted 30 November 2006 - 10:03 PM
#1465
Posted 30 November 2006 - 11:45 PM
Quote
The Dartmouth controversy shows that the "Fighting Sioux" debate is about more than just UND; it's about discrimination in general. Continuing our losing battle to preserve an outdated name is only making UND look bad, not like the top-tier institution our administrators claim we are becoming.
Sure someone on a campus a thousand miles away stirs up a hornet's nest on UND's campus and somehow UND is to blame. The AD even admitted that the statements were aimed at her campus over local incidents. Come on DS folks grow a brain.
#1466
Posted 01 December 2006 - 01:21 AM
Quote
I'd guess that UND is already there, not just becoming.
#1467
Posted 01 December 2006 - 08:49 AM
Quote
Reading that makes me want to throw up. COME ON! It's obvious that Dartmouth has a whole pile of problems and tried to take some of the heat off of themselves and put it on us-if anything it has brought their problems to light and everyone is seeing how much better [sarcasm] off everyone is for it, and how all of their problems are gone, because they have dropped their 'hostile and abusive' nickname and logo.
I'm sorry, but I think that this statement is just like saying it's someone's fault-by the way that they dress- that they got raped.
#1468
Posted 01 December 2006 - 09:05 AM
Quote
So, from the Stupid's point of view debate equates to "division". Typical of the name change mentality. Anybody who questions or opposes a name change creates division. Moreover, it's not the Sioux name/logo that created this division, so much as the narrow, intolerant objectives of a certain, tiny group of people who think they should dictate others' thoughts, values and beliefs.
#1469
Posted 06 December 2006 - 09:38 AM
No Sense In Anti-Mascot Crusade
Quote
No, the best thing Scalise has done recently is to do nothing at all. That’s compared to Dartmouth AD Josie Harper, who recently issued a written public apology in the campus newspaper to “the Native American community, and the Dartmouth community as a whole,” for scheduling a men’s hockey game between the Big Green and the University of North Dakota Fighting Sioux. According to Harper, “UND’s position,” i.e. having a nickname and mascot that invoke a native tribe, is “offensive and wrong.”
Groan.
At heart, this is an issue of 21st century political correctness. The history of unjust dealings with Native Americans is utterly reprehensible and there’s an impulse to try to make amends now, post-violence, by outlawing stereotypical depictions of indigenous culture.
#1470
Posted 06 December 2006 - 04:12 PM
Quote
Classic.


Help
Add Reply
Back to top
MultiQuote








