Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
brianvf

2014-15 Season

233 posts in this topic

UND did miss the net a couple of times during the game but of the 7 shots on net, 3 were registered in the last few minutes. If you didn't see it, it really was that bad.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fire Idalski?

Simple question.

After one terrible game?  No way.  Getting to the top of the league will take more time, with Minnesota and Wisconsin being who they are.  I think 3rd place in the WCHA this year would be appropriate.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fire Idalski?

Simple question.

If he was there wouldn't be any tears shed in GF.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Girls let one slip away as Bucky tied the game in last minute. 3-3 tie.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Girls let one slip away as Bucky tied the game in last minute. 3-3 tie.

 

They at least won the shootout.  ;)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fire Idalski?

Simple question.

Funny there isn't a fire Idalski thread like they do for Hak.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

UMN doesn't appear quite so unbeatable this year.

Not exactly their best weekend against BSU.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

UMN doesn't appear quite so unbeatable this year.

Not exactly their best weekend against BSU.

I knew Scanlan would be a good a fit for Bemidji. Great guy who knows how to treat his athletes and knows the game as good as anyone.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Lammy girls leave and the interest in womens hockey basically disappears.

The Sioux womens program is either second or third every year among attendance numbers across the country. Heck I even saw one of the Lammy twins at the Saturday afternoon game. 

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

anyone listen to timmy and swygy this morning? my god that bashed idalski and the womens hockey in general. I know idalski is not very well liked in GF but cut him a break its womens hockey for cripes sakes.

 

tomorrows coaches show going to be an awkard one I have a feeling...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

anyone listen to timmy and swygy this morning? my god that bashed idalski and the womens hockey in general. I know idalski is not very well liked in GF but cut him a break its womens hockey for cripes sakes.

 

tomorrows coaches show going to be an awkard one I have a feeling...

Womens hockey or not they put in the time like the guys to get to where they are at. No need to belittle them. Timmy and Swygy should be ashamed of themselves. And yes Idalski is not well liked. That is well known in Grand Forks.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey, the women are just switching roles with the men this year:

 

The women are digging the big, early hole and will have to scramble the rest of the way. 

 

 

Idalski's on the "Hakstol Plan". :D 

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Womens hockey or not they put in the time like the guys to get to where they are at. No need to belittle them. Timmy and Swygy should be ashamed of themselves. And yes Idalski is not well liked. That is well known in Grand Forks.

I don't think anyone can question whether the student athletes put in the time.  I think the question is whether it's prudent to dedicate significant funds and resources to a program that doesn't make any money but costs a whole bunch (I'm assuming).  That's the way I took the Tim and Swyg conversation.    I don't think that's throwing anyone under the bus, but just asking a legitimate question.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think anyone can question whether the student athletes put in the time.  I think the question is whether it's prudent to dedicate significant funds and resources to a program that doesn't make any money but costs a whole bunch (I'm assuming).  That's the way I took the Tim and Swyg conversation.    I don't think that's throwing anyone under the bus, but just asking a legitimate question.

Two words: Title Nine

 

And most collegiate athletic programs are money losers, not just women's hockey.  If making money is a requirement, you wouldn't have more than two or three sponsored sports in NCAA athletics.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's just have women's bball men's hockey men's football girls volleyball girls cheerleading girls dancing

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's just have women's bball men's hockey men's football girls volleyball girls cheerleading girls dancing

 

You're only about six women's and six men's sports short of the minimums to be a Division I member. 

 

(Let me help you out: Six. That's all the pointy things on one hand plus the thumb on the other. ;)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Scanlan for president?

He did sweep the gophers on the road

Have we ever done that? Simple question.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0